The Democrats were furious Monday over eight senators who caved to support a deal to end the government shutdown that does not include the Affordable Care Act subsidies their party had spent weeks fighting for.

The offending lawmakers include Democratic Senators Dick Durbin, Tim Kaine, Jacky Rosen, John Fetterman, Catherine Cortez Masto, Maggie Hassan, Jeanne Shaheen, and independent Senator Angus King, who claimed that they’d ensured a Senate vote on extending the tax credits. Their capitulation comes after House Speaker Mike Johnson insisted for weeks that he wouldn’t promise them a vote on anything, and even if he does follow through with a vote, it’s unlikely such a measure will pass the House.

Democratic lawmakers slammed their colleagues for forfeiting health care coverage for an estimated 5.1 million Americans by 2034 and increasing premiums across the marketplace.

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders railed against the deal while speaking before the Senate Sunday. “If this vote succeeds, over 20 million Americans are gonna see at least a doubling in their premiums in the Affordable Care Act,” he said. “For certain groups of people, it will be a tripling and a quadrupling of their premiums. There are people who will now be paying 50 percent of their limited incomes for health care. Does anybody in the world think that makes sense?”

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    47
    ·
    5 months ago

    And if the vote happens and passes and people get to keep their health care, will you apologize to all these democrats and admit they made the right decision?

    • elbucho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      5 months ago

      And if the vote never materializes, or ends in inevitable failure, will you apologize for posting stupid fucking hypotheticals like this one?

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This is absolutely not going to be what happens or it would’ve happened already

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think raising attention to this issue is the only thing Democrats could hope to accomplish. And they did it with the shutdown.

        Now if Republicans do not hold a vote, or if they vote against it, there will be much more negative attention given to them.

        I believe this funding only goes until Jan 31st. So if they don’t pass the healthcare in December, the government will just be shut down again.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          What are you smoking? 8 Democrats have now cosigned a poison pill of throwing millions of people off healthcare in addition to everything trump is doing with the government.

          Not a single concession from republicans. This outcome is only slightly better than just approving the republican budget and there will be another budget fight in 3 months that republicans will be more prepared for.

          • danc4498@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            5 months ago

            And what is keeping the government shutdown going to do that is different? They would still lose their healthcare!

            Do you honestly believe the Republicans were going to cave on this issue?

                • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Their budget is not infinite and there’s reason to believe they were already dipping into funding stashes they shouldn’t be out of desperation. Imo if you can defund the people terrorizing your cities that is consequential positive.

                  • danc4498@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Yeah, if that were happen, when I agree. But I believe they would be the last ones to lose pay. Just out of spite.

                    How many innocent people would be negatively impacted before ICE lost a paycheck?

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think raising attention to this issue is the only thing Democrats could hope to accomplish.

          They certainly raised attention to how utterly worthless they have always been and always will be.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s a couple of fucking enormous ifs you’re basing your dreams on. In all my days, and I’m very old, a party caving while they had the support of the voters but the minority in Congress has never worked out.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        In all your days had a government shutdown ever resulted in anything substantial?

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Substantial yes, but not necessarily good. One enabled Reagan to get the Contras funded,one helped Bush lower taxes on the wealthy, another led to Clinton’s reelection…

          In general the population has blamed Republicans for causing shutdowns, through history, but Democrats have repeatedly caved on them without attaining their goals.

          I sincerely hope this one brings about the end of Schumer’s career.