Do you think people would open their eyes and become more neighborly? Would it free people to actually talk to their friends, go to actual events in person? Or is everyone already entrenched too far?

And yes its ironic im posting this online. However I like to think of how the world would react if we could disable the internet for a few months. Besides the chaos of banking and airlines, I think it would be a net positive on humanity.

Until then, ill go back to being mostly disconnected on weekends. Its great.

  • BismuthYellow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Maybe, depends on the people. Some neighbours might love to get back together like how they used to, others might start fighting again.

    Personally i’d just quit on living. I highly doubt i’d find the same community where i currently am, i’m not going back to feeling completely alone and just faking my life again.

  • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 days ago

    The internet is helpful for finding community and support, especially for LGBT+ people, people with mental health issues, or neurodivergent people. I for one am very glad that the internet is very much up and that the legislators have not succeeded in fully censoring it.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I’m pretty sure we’d have a lot of blood on our hands. The internet does in fact facilitate medical appointments, records, and makes drugs and supplies more accessible.

  • Krudler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Yes.

    I grew up in the 70’s where you’d run naked out of the shower to take a phone call, because that might be your only opportunity to be invited to a social occasion or event that day/week. Nobody ever turned down an invite to lunch, cards night, bingo, pot luck, watching vacation slides, etc, etc, etc. That was the chance to see the world, connect with people and hear what was going on.

    I grew up when you’d read the same shampoo bottle 10 times every time you took a shit, hoping you’d find some new detail you once missed.

    I grew up when reading every single word of the newspaper, literally from cover-to-cover was a normal thing, for want of better options.

    So I feel if people were forced back into the system of non-instant communication, it would automatically make humans come back together. We are social creatures, and The Internet & SM is an ersatz version of socializing, but if it were gone people would have to find it in real life again.

  • That’s rough. Don’t wanna go outside, lots of armed masked men outside.

    (Am a foreign-born non-white American)

    Probably just have to to get a bunch of DVDs and actually get a DVD player that works since the old one is filled with dust and broken. (Or is it a “BluRay” these days?)

    I’m probably gonna have to get ham radios, without the internet, there would be a lot more traffic, so I’d probably have to get comfortable using my voice. Probably get a shortwave radio so I get get foreign broadcasts. TV also needs to be replaced.

    I’d have to get like actual encyclopedias.

    Honestly, it’d be a pain. No piracy is gonna make things cost too much. I doubt Libraries would even have them since they’d all be loaned out.

    TLDR: It’d suck, very fucking much.

  • wowwoweowza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I believe that the perfect internet is 1999 but with Wikipedia.

    That’s it.

    All tech: 1999 and before. Flip phones. MP3 players. DVD. Etc.

    It was perfect and corporations did not suck our souls out through our assholes.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    We could just get rid of Internet 2.0 - that’s when the tech broligarchs took over the beautiful original internet and make it into a bunch of surveillance capitalist walled gardens with psyop addictive algorithms that turned people into ad-consumption cash cows.

    Leaving the infrastructure in place for useful, non society-destroying uses would avoid throwing the baby out with the filthy bathwater.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Idk my neighbors are pretty openly racist and so are 90% of the people in my uni. Internet has few cool people at least.

  • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    There was a power outage in the Modwest in 2003 or so. It lasted a few days.

    Businesses were mostly closed down, so everyone basically had a few days off. There was a life to the community that I had never experienced. People with generators were visiting old friends, running their fridges for a few hours at a time, and the parks were full. People were generally friendly and helpful to each other. Then after a few days, the power came back on and life went back to normal.

    If we destroyed the internet, I wouldn’t expect the same thing to happen. Businesses would readjust, and life would find a new normal (perhaps looking a little more like the 90s). But I doubt it would change much with how neighborly people are.

    What seems to trigger that sense of community is a shared experience, especially hardships. So if things keep going downhill, a silver lining will probably be a renaissance of community.

  • IronBird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    no, people hated each other before the internet…even moreso than they do now. believe it or not, media giants has an easier time bubbling people pre-internet

  • moondoggie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s not so much the internet as it is advertising. A lot of what we’re dealing with now came from the advent of 24 hour news networks. Prior to that, there was a half hour of local news and a half hour of national news twice per night and then a morning news show on each of three networks. Then 24 hour news networks came around and they had to fill that 24 hours with whatever would keep people glued to the channel so the network could pull in more ad revenue. That lead to more sensational stories and to other networks specifically catering to people’s baser emotions. Then the internet comes about and it all starts happening on a grander scale, working for clicks instead of ratings. There’s always people willing to encourage the worst of us as long as they can make a buck off of it.

  • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    What is ‘the internet’ to you? I think this term means different things to different people. I imagine to people born in the latest generations the internet is social media and productivity corpo sites. To them the internet is youtube, tiktok, twitter, reddit, their bank, and whatever slop services they subscribe to magically beamed into pocket computer through technomagical nerd shit like “5g” and processed through “microprocessors” and other stuff they’ dont care to really understand because its all abstracted away.

    I was born early enough for the internet to be nothing more than two computers barely powerful enough to run a GUI calling eachother up through telephone wires to share goofy web 1.0 blogspam. I remember when low res images were the norm and when pre-google youtube was just coming into being. When AOL and Myspace and Newgrounds/flash games. I remember being a kid and loving computers because I never knew what new cool website was on the horizon to discover and play with. I remember that people used things like newsgroups and pre-craigslist to meet up for transactions.

    This is the internet, to me. At least what it once was and what it can be again. People using the digital landscape to freely express themselves with their own hardware. To come together to share in hobbies and interest and passions.

    We could have that again if we all bought into a standardized radio based mesh network that could host personal sites while acting as a routing node.

    But I don’t know if the general public will ever be pushed to partake in this network. They would have to be squeezed very hard to try alternatives to the common way of things.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I should say, destroy web 3.0, ha. But I was only looking at the negatives of internet which to me are social media, corporate takeover, and cheapening of human creativity.

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Yeah, most likely. People still would want to socialise so they’d force themselves out of their comfort zones. Also, the dummies wouldn’t be so heavily propagandized so at least they’d have a chance to naturally grow out of blanket xenophobia, for instance.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      True.

      The good news is any of us can disconnect at any time. Maybe I should have titled the post, what if we destroyed toxic social media, that seems like the actual problem.