“Whether you like it, or not, history is on our side. We will bury you,” he said quoting former USSR leader Nikita Khrushchev.

Russian politician Dmitry Medvedev said on Tuesday Russia could have a right to go to war with NATO.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wonder… does medvedev have enough wits left to understand that if Russia has that right… then everyone … has that right?

    They’re finding Ukraine difficult enough. Sure we’re sharing some toys (a lot of toys)… but they don’t have carriers or attack subs or missile destroyers…

    Threatening nato is not a sane decision to make. We might just take them at their word.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      2 years ago

      The toys we’re sharing are our older toys from the 80s and 90s even. Its not even the more deadly stuff we have…and they’re fighting against a force that’s getting a few weeks training on these toys and sent out into the field. If russia truly wants a 72 hour war…all it would need to do is attack NATO.

      • Ertebolle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, Ukraine is excited about maybe getting some F-16s and how much that could help with the air war and meanwhile a couple of F-22s could take down a whole squadron of them.

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          A squadron of f-22s could take down most air forces.

          An air wing could probably beat all other air forces combined, with the possible exception of china, though damn they would need to figure out how to keep reloaded.

          The USAF is the strongest air force in the world.

          The second strongest is the US navy Air wing.

          Think the marines are 4.

          Edit: this is an old listing, and russia was #3, so I think we actually have the trifecta.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yea I feel like all the charts with russia on them need to be redrawn… it’s clearly noticable at this point they’ve been a paper military.

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            At one point I believe the Navy had more aircraft total than the AF, but they had them beat in specialization. AF does the heavy lift jobs, stealth, and up until recently, space launches and satellites. I think Navy and Marine F-18’s fly more sorties though.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s not the war, it’s the keeping.

          In any case, we’d probably bog down around the same time China and everyone else on that side got involved. I don’t think it would be as clean or as quick. But, yeah. We could definitely screw them pretty harshly without ever landing troops

          • Candelestine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            2 years ago

            China and Russia have no military alliance, Xi is just taking advantage of the fantastic business opportunity that opened up for him for cheap Russian imports. If Chinese troops became militarily involved in Russian territory, it would probably be to acquire their claims over eastern Siberia, dating back to the Qing Dynasty. Otherwise he’s just be supporting a state that competes with him for the dominant regional position.

            The Tsar took that land from them, back in the day though. If you look at their current claimed territories, they never forgot. Maybe if Russia agreed to become a subject state of China, then they’d help militarily, but they’re certainly not friends or allies.

            Russia does have actual allies, but not many. And China isn’t one of them.

            • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              So what you’re saying is we could Jalta Russia at the Urals with the Chinese and set up Cold War 2 on a really big scale?

          • snooggums@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            We don’t need to occupy Russia to stop them from continuing a war that they start. We can just destroy their equipment and manufacturing locations so their armed forces surrender.

          • bluGill@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            There isn’t anyone really on that side . China and NATO have differences, but China doesn’t have anything to gain from helping Russia, and nthey lose a lot is NATO loses. They will sit out. Similar with India, they will stay out . Iran or a few other small counties might consider joining, but I doubt it as most are smart enough to know that is suicide.

            • Hank@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Idk, China might see the spread of resources as a good opportunity to try an invasion of Taiwan.

              • bluGill@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                Maybe, Xi seems just sane enough not to try, but who knows. China and Russia can’t really win against NATO though they make things harder. India likely hates China enough to join NATO as well.

                Of course we are talking nuclear armed countries so everyone loses is possible.

              • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                Putin made his move because Xi sounded like he was going to go at the same time.

                Xi was closing on HK and planned to switch immediately to Taiwan, even started the domestic pivot, then his navy told him they needed at least 5 years (honestly its more like 15, they are just starting carrier flight ops on the Liaoning and their newer ones aren’t shaken down yet).

                Putin had made his preparations, Xi hinted he might go anyway once the west was distracted.

                If daddy z hadn’t stayed in kyiv history would look really bad right now.

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        There’s also the option that it’s going to be a 30-ish minute war. 50-ish if the other side manages to get their counter value force airborne.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Or the big guns. If they start attacking the nuclear powers, things are going to get very spicy very quickly.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      Russia is the irritating kid down the street who just broke his nerf gun so he’s threatening to throw the darts at you instead and tell his mom you’re not invited to his birthday party…

  • blue_zephyr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    War has fuck-all to do with rights. If you’re going to attack a NATO country we will beat your ass back into the stone age without mercy, your nukes won’t save you if you dare cross that line.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      No but they’ll sure kill a lot of us, whichever ones still fire and hit their marks at least. Who’s to say if they’ve maintained their stock over the decades.

      And the citizens will be told the whole time about how it’s some plot to destroy them as people, to stoke the flames.

      An actual war with Russia wouldn’t end well for anyone short of having an internal coup with an actual plan for government afterwards instead of this slow handoff of power from one authoritarian dictator to the next.

      • jcit878@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        an actual war with russia wont end well for russia, thats about it. even russia isnt dumb enough to try nuclear war

        • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Don’t confuse the requirement of lack of intelligence with the willingness of a person willing to drag the world to hell as they’re being taken down.

  • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    So has Denmark.

    Though it would be funny ig Russia didn’t. Imagine Putin declaring war on Poland and Poland just saying “no, it’s against the law.”

  • 30mag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Whether you like it, or not, history is on our side.

    I think they’re trying to provoke a war so NATO will overhaul Russia’s economy and infrastructure à la the Marshall plan.

    • notatoad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      i doubt they want to take it that far, but i’ve got to assume at least some of putin’s cronies are thinking if they goad him into something stupid enough, they can get rid of him and take over for themselves.

      • 30mag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        There isn’t going to be much left to take over if they don’t hurry it up.

      • 30mag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It also saves face since Russia would be BTFO by 20 countries instead by only Ukraine.

      • charliespider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You jest now but that’s only because you’re not staring down the barrel of a T64 that’s run out of gas because the crew sold their reserves on the black market for vodka.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well, recent history involves a lot of wars kicking Russians ass. Afghanistan, Chechnya, Ukraine…

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    I mean… he’s not wrong? They could have a war with NATO any time they wanted it. Russia could have war with NATO whenever they want it. They’ve been very careful to not actually DO that, of course. Last thing they need is to start losing another one with someone who won’t have any difficulty in bringing the full conflict right to them.

  • WiildFiire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    How are they gonna have time to bury anybody when they’re busy burying hundreds of thousands of citizens they force to go to war for them?