I’m super curious why you’re asking.
Carbon monoxide in a voting place could affect which choices are picked by voters who use the booths.
Ohhhhh. Okay, yeah, so I worked for a data aggregation company for a time and there was absolutely an odd (personally identified) correlation between lead exposure areas of the US and heavily red voting.
I worked for an insurance company in latent bodily injury claims (asbestos, lead paint, etc), and the symptoms of lead paint poisoning include lowered IQ, reduced emotional control, impaired risk assessment, and increased aggression.
There was a black man killed by cops for the crime of impoliteness in response to racial profiling several years ago, who had been one of our claimants. I didn’t find a reference to lead paint on the Wikipedia page, so I don’t think it’s public information and I won’t say who, but it’s unfortunately not a unique story.
Lead paint is nearly exclusively still present in awful apartments rented by slumlords to the poorest people in the US.
There’s also ambient exposure from leaded gasoline, but that’s not really an ongoing problem anymore (for now, I could see this regime fully legalizing leaded gas again). Even though lead hasn’t been legal in house paint since 1978, shitty landlords just painted over it instead of remediating it, so kids get exposed to sweet tasting paint flakes, as well as the dust released when it flakes off ending up in their homes or in the soil surrounding their buildings.
Nah, y’all can stop blaming lead.
Lead makes people more aggressive, not transform you into a nazi.
My city still have issues with children getting lead poisoned, but its blue af. People become nazis by choice. You can’t just shift the blame to lead.
Edit: To re-iterate: “My lead poisoning made me do it” is not a valid excuse at the Nurenmberg trial.
I hope no one is going into the booth without a choice already made.
If there’s carbon monoxide, then someone might fill in a bubble thinking it makes the candidate less likely to win, get the candidates mixed up, forget to fill in the bubble, etc.
Oh, maybe. But then it could go either direction. So that shouldn’t affect results.
I’m no expert, but wouldn’t that require more longterm exposure? As opposed to a few minutes in a voting place that is.
I mean, voting booths aren’t airtight, you could just have one for the polling place
I haven’t voted in person for several years, but all the polling places I remember had all the doors open to the outside air. A basketball gym, a church side-hall, someone’s home garage. And the booths are just curtained frames. But then again, I live in Los Angeles so it’s not freezing in November. Maybe it’s different in Minnesota.
I believe any such regulations would be on a state by state basis, though I doubt any are actually enacted.
In short, no.
Voting in the U.S. is run by the individual states, and each one sets their own rules and policies.
The federal government does set some minimum rules that only apply to federal elections, but those rules don’t even require the use of voting booths: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2024-title11-vol1/pdf/CFR-2024-title11-vol1.pdf
Adding on to this; I’d be very surprised if there was a locality within the U.S. that didn’t require every building to have carbon monoxide detectors, but again, voting doesn’t even have to occur within a building.
I LMFAO’ed at this question 🤣
