• starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    People really don’t seem to understand that video game prices have not kept up with inflation. It’s why I didn’t bat an eye at spending $70 on Baldur’s Gate 3 despite the original costing like $50. When you account for inflation, it’s actually cheaper.

    That said, I avoid Nintendo on principle. Refusing to sell old games so that they can sue people who pirate them is ghoulish and inhuman. As long as Gary Bowser is forced to pay them, I never will.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        An expanding market and competition don’t change the fact that prices go up when prices go up. I suppose I can grant that it’s cheaper to sell ones and zeros over the internet than it is to ship a bunch of discs to every GameStop. But still, physical manufacturing and distribution make up a small percentage of the price of a game