• I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    No, the way they got people to work was by enslaving them; then by “it’s not slavery, you just can’t leave without my permission” serfdom; then by forcing rural families to migrate to cities because mr landowner bought everything (or killed the owners), so that the factories could pay poverty level salaries; then, when workers got too riled up, by outsourcing work to wherever people were desperate enough to accept 10% of the pay.

    • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      I think you missed the part just prior to slavery where we had to work to avoid starving to death naked and alone exposed the elements.

        • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          Or rather, people have the urge to survive and will do whatever it takes.

          Whether that’s the hard labor of small groups subsistence level existing, for the reward of not starving and suffering the elements. Or putting sandwiches in a bag for a one room apartment and a cell phone.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    We’ve long since discarded the faggy liberal Democrat reward system with the superior punishment system. /s

    We’ve gone from the reward being more happiness to the reward being less suffering.

    • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Probably because the people who relaxed would soon be murdered by a more organized group with better nutrition, numbers, or weapons.

  • turnip@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    This is because boomers now consume less, so currency needs to be debased to provide the level of consumption to increase, to match 2% inflation.

    The less people consume as demographics age the more repressed the youth will be, as we lock up inelastic goods behind massive debt. It doesn’t matter how nominally rich boomers get, if they don’t consume our money supply will grow.