Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated he is willing to resign if it ensures peace or NATO membership for Ukraine.

“If it is peace for Ukraine, and if you really want me to leave my post, I’m ready,” he said. “Alternatively, I can trade this for NATO membership… I’m focusing on Ukraine’s security today, not in 20 years.”

His comments come amid tensions with Donald Trump, who falsely suggested the Ukrainian president was responsible for starting the war.

Meanwhile, U.S.-Russia negotiations continue without Ukraine, which Zelenskyy firmly rejects. Zelenskyy emphasized the importance of Ukrainian involvement in any peace negotiations.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is what being a leader looks like.

    It would be a shame if a shit end to this war buries Zelensky in history. He’s not perfect, but he deserves some monuments.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        The sad part is the majority of his voters lose power and their country. The wage gap will only grow. Unless you were already rich, or had an income of a few million dollars a year, you only made life harder for yourself. But hey, at least those other people have it harder as well!

        • InputZero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          The thing is that it doesn’t matter how bad Trump makes it for maga voters so long as he makes it worse for those labeled as undesirable have it worse. As long as maga voters can look to someone else and power trip over them they’ll give Trump carte blanche. As long as those ‘perverted trans pedophiles’ can be assaulted without the fear of being arrested they’re happy.

  • Subtracty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 month ago

    The actions of a man who loves his country and not power? Politicians in the US (on both sides) could never comprehend this.

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        He literally cannot resign right now. What he is talking about. There’s isn’t even legal framework for it. I’m sure they’d find a way of they had to. But as it stands right now.

        No one can remove him from office under Martial Law.

        He is bound by oath and constitution to serve his country as head of state and may not delegate those responsibilities.

        Elections are prohibited under Martial Law.

        • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Frankly, these are really bad laws. It is a good thing that he appears not to be inclined to even try to take advantage, but those laws explicitly encourage remaining at war in order to maintain power, so a worse person would definitely be trying to maintain a forever war situation.

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 month ago

      plenty, like the Banderite Zalushni who is way more popular.
      But OC most opposition parties are forbidden, opponents put in jail and there are no elections.

  • Lit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    lol now, US president Krasnov Trump can’t say President Zelensky is a dictator.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    If Russia gets Ukraine, it’ll be 2-3 years of peace while Russia rebuilds and regroups it’s forces before it’s onto invading the next country. Probably Poland, Belarus, or Georgia. And he’ll keep doing it again and again - waging war with the west until they win or the public decides that saving a few pennies on their taxes is more important than preventing totalitarianism from subsuming Europe again.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Because that’s literally what happened when Putin annexed Crimea. The west let him keep the territory he stole as a concession and then he just invaded again a few years later.

        Holy shit, do you people have the memory of a goldfish? First it’s “Zelenskyy started the war” and now this… Embarrassing that you’re this ignorant about what’s going on in the world.

  • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Literally the opposite of what Trump does - gives up everything in order to retain power.

  • credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    NATO aint what it used to be. I suggest a new startup instead.

    Edit: Lol, people downvoting me when one of the founding members is threatening to invade other members. Idiots.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Even if the USA were to leave NATO or refuse to participate, there still isn’t a better security guarantee than the remaining block being obligated to engage militarily in your defense, and the block still contains nuclear powers.

      • credo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Right… so start a new organization with those members. Ukraine isn’t joining NATO with Trump holding veto powers. Anyone who can’t see this is myopic.

        Why would the US leave when the russian asset can do more damage from within?

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ok, so that’s the crux of it that I think was unclear in your original post.

          Your initial post was read by me (and presumably others) as “NATO without the backing of the USA isn’t a meaningful defense group”

          But I think what you’re saying is “ENTRY to NATO with the USA pulling the strings is an unrealistic goal”

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s a bit confusing, since nato was always the US protection racket for its vasals who had to buy their crap to assist them every few years when the great policeman of the world decided some poor country needed to be bombed into democracy.
      Now the master, impotent on the world stage is cannibalising its own.

      As the demon Kissinger said: it may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal.

  • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    he has nothing to give up or offer.
    he will not participate in what is decided on ex ukraine.

      • Chris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        Pretty sure this individual has an agenda, go look at their comment history.

        When I get worked up I will absolutely make a few long posts, but this thread alone is a lot.

        Wish I could tag users in lemmy/jerboa

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 month ago

        Drafting people by force and not allowing any male between 18-60 to leave the country it’s ukranian government decision. Being invaded by someone doesn’t magically turn you into a hero.

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          Mkay, not a dictator? He’s considered a hero by many for defending their homes from a colonist actual dictator.

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 month ago

            for defending their homes

            Politicians don’t fight their wars. It’s a bunch of poor people like you and me that defend their homes and they don’t need rulers to do it.

            • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 month ago

              He’s in Ukraine. Organizing running the country and visiting the front lines. Generals are needed in wars to organize things, even when they don’t fight. If Zelenskyy left Ukraine then sure. Also Zelenskyy is not a dictator.

        • TheBeege@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          So what the fuck would you do? And then play out a realistic scenario of the result of your idea

    • Noite_Etion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s so funny.

      He is an authoritarian ruler, but the only examples you can provide are events that occurred AFTER the war started.

      Russia attacked another country, but the guy desperately fighting off a world power is the bad guy.

      Fuck you are stupid.