Summary

Since Donald Trump’s return to office, ICE and DEA agents have intensified immigration enforcement, conducting door-to-door sweeps in Colorado.

Initially targeting suspected criminals, recent operations now question all residents, regardless of warrants. A Denver apartment complex saw widespread searches, sparking protests and fear among undocumented families.

Activists and attorneys are mobilizing to inform residents of their rights. Schools report growing student anxiety.

Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, confirmed a broad crackdown, declaring, “If you’re in the country illegally, you’re on the table.”

  • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ah, the freedom-loving government flexing its muscle by turning neighborhoods into checkpoints. Door-to-door sweeps? That’s not law enforcement; that’s a dystopian scavenger hunt.

    Let’s not pretend this is about “safety.” It’s about fear—fear as policy, fear as spectacle. When agents knock on every door “just in case,” they’re not enforcing laws; they’re shredding trust. Schools full of anxious kids? Families sleeping with one eye open? That’s the real legacy here.

    And Tom Homan’s “on the table” rhetoric? Sounds more like a threat than governance. If this is the new normal, then democracy’s just a word we slap on the side of the bus while it careens off a cliff.

    • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      Homan didn’t just threaten individuals and communities, he threatened city and state officials who would dare get in his way. Almost like he knows what he’s doing will draw a lot of ire.

      He’s taking small town good ol’ boy sheriff attitude to the federal level, that’s why conservatives love him.

      • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        The good ol’ boy sheriff attitude isn’t just a personality quirk—it’s a power fetish wrapped in folksy branding. Conservatives don’t love him for his “toughness”; they love him because he’s a blunt instrument for their authoritarian fantasies.

        Threatening officials isn’t law enforcement; it’s political theater designed to intimidate and dominate. The ire he’s drawing? That’s the sound of people waking up to the fact that this isn’t governance—it’s performative cruelty masquerading as leadership.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I feel like they are pushing everyone to the breaking point. How long until they knock on the wrong door and get shot?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Doesn’t hurt to know your legal rights, but we’re also in “put people in a concentration camp” territory now, so they will likely be ignored.

      • gift_of_gab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        The thing is you have to force them to do it illegally, brutally, while people can see it. If you give in, if you agree to things, it’s too easy for them.

        Yes, many people who stand up to them will die. It’s already been allowed to get to that point. Yet if you sit back and give in, it happens so much more quickly, and much more brutally.

        This is especially true if you’re white, or at least not openly a minority. If you’re a middle aged white male, make them go through you. It’s dangerous, you might not make it, so make sure you’re ready. White men standing up to them, constantly, is cognitive dissonance to them. They’ll expect you to always be on your side, and when everyone isn’t, they stumble.

        If people constantly resist them at every angle they will fail. We will lose good people doing it, and we have to.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          So we went from “pelase vote in November” to “some of you may die, but that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make”? Holy dystopian nightmare, batman.

          • gift_of_gab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            So we went from “pelase vote in November” to “some of you may die, but that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make”? Holy dystopian nightmare, batman.

            When people didn’t vote against Fascists? Yes.

            And it’s not about what people being ‘willing’ to watch others die, it’s about people standing up and being willing to die for their less powerful neighbours. I’m middle aged, male (AMAB, anyway) and white. I’ll stand between any cops, military, whatever and my fellow citizens. My grandmother (moms side) was in the Dutch resistance and was caught helping people escape the Nazi’s and spend 1941-1945 in a camp; she never fully recovered and converted to Atheism from Catholicism on her death bed, stating ‘no just God would allow what I have seen and lived through.’ My grandfather (dads side) served in the Canadian army from 1939 to 1945, and went to every country we fought in. He never slept in the same bed as my grandmother because he had screaming, wake-up-fighting nightmares from what he saw. He drove a motorcycle, delivering orders, moving supplies, etc. He was driving in a ditch beside a convoy just before dawn, for hours, and the ditch was so bumpy he had to keep slowing down because the motorcycle kept slipping. When the light broke, they were finally able to see, and he realised he was driving over the bodies of women and children from nearby villages. The ‘slipping’ was because the bodies were decaying and the motorcycle couldn’t grip, and he and his partner in the side-car took turns holding the handle bars while the other vomited over the side. They couldn’t turn around because beside the ditch was a cliff, and the convoy was bumper to bumper; they drove for six hours, at maybe 5 km/h, sobbing and vomiting. He never told me the story, he refused to talk about the war with me or my brothers, but in a drunken stupor my father told us my grandfathers war stories.

            We pretend it’s somehow going to be different this time, like this time fascists can be appeased, this time they won’t invade other countries, or take away all of your rights. 30,000 people are already in camps. We all know what is coming next. You can stand aside like the German people did, watch and wring your hands, tell yourselves lies about the ‘clean Wehrmacht,’ yet everyone knows what’s happening. If we don’t stand up to them, we encourage it to happen.

            • Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s not if they can be appeased or not, it’s that half the country wants them in power. You are talking about a civil war.

              • gift_of_gab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s not half that want them, it’s like 20%. 80% are allowing them to do these things.

                Sure, civil war, civil disobedience, call it whatever you want. They’re putting children in camps, at what point do ‘you’ (the people of the US) stand up to it? Do they need to create death camps with ovens before you all react, or are you going to ‘aww geez’ at not wanting to stand up to them? The nazi’s made it illegal to save children from being tortured to death, at what point do you say ‘law’ be damned, I won’t watch this happen?

                • Tja@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I don’t know. They already (famously) put children in cages last time around, AND-PEOPLE-STILL-VOTED-FOR-HIM.

                  About percentages, 77M+ people voted R, and IIRC there were 160M registered voters, so close to half of voters voted for him, much more than 20%.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          There is a gulf of difference between “they will not respect your rights” and “you should give in.”

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      It helps if you google (specifically Google) things immigrants might google. It hides hotspots on the map for search terms.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Specifically, click this and search for a made up name. The goal is not to ddos. This is a useful site that we want to stay up. The goal is privacy. They’re not above using this data.

        Tell your loved ones that if you are detained by ICE, they can try to use ICE’s online detainee locator to find you: https://locator.ice.gov/odls/#/search

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    2017 Democrats: “Trump’s expansion of the ICE is creating a personal police force to do his bidding.”

    2025 Democrats: “The fuck you want me to do about it? I already warned you this would happen.”

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “If you are in the country illegally, you are on the table”

    Sounds pretty reasonable to me.

    You people and businesses need to understand you can’t build quality of life by using semi slave work

    • Uruanna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      What you’re pretending to miss is that those in powers are making sure that those people remain “illegal” , on purpose. In the first place, you’re the one creating the situation of them being “in the country illegally”.

      The correct solution is to give them papers, not to deport them and treat them like criminals for a situation you put them in. Remember that the “you’re on the table” argument that you claim is reasonable is putting them in prison where you can exploit them harder as slaves, it’s only one step after what’s happening to them already.

      Everyone can be illegal if you don’t make anyone legal and then claim they’re only getting punished because they broke the law. There’s nothing reasonable there.

    • towelie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, because sending them to guantanamo, children and women included, is so humane. Good thing they won’t be in America where they are ‘slaves’.

    • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Let me put it to you this way.

      If we really cared about people in the country illegally, we’d aim for having people who hire these people under the table, also illegally, sanctioned. If you were honestly wanting to see less illegal immigration, you’d be deterring them from ever coming in by drying up the supply of under-the-table, low-paying jobs that attract them here. Maybe by advocating for a 10 x median annual salary for every undocumented worker found on your staff, enforced strongly?

      If you can’t find it in your soul to do that, then all you’re here for is smashing disadvantaged people in the face.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Another point you missed, to join on the dogpile, is that all immigration, of all kinds, for any and every country, is a net economic benefit.

      Its shooting yourself in the foot, purely monetarily, economically, fiscally speaking, for ideological-only reasons.