• Brekky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is that true? I thought recycling was giving new purpose to an old object. Reuse to me implies another person using the object but in the same way it was originally intended.

      • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No, that’s reusing. Recycling is breaking down the product into materials so it can be used to make new stuff.

        The cycle in recycle means the production cycle.

    • Vinstaal0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Reparing is the first one, idk where reduce comes into the saying.

      Maybe we need to include a 4th R?

      • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would argue that repair is part of re-use, since you are allowing it to be used again. So would be part of the second r. The first r is reduce, which would boil down to: if you already have one, don’t buy another. It’s more effective to not need the resources in the first place.