• LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      2 years ago

      While the title of the story is interesting, this tidbit was buried further down:

      Sound of Freedom" surprised critics by smashing box office projections, grossing more than $150 million so far. The film had a $14.5 million budget. Social media users have suggested that the film is using “astroturfing,” a practice of buying up hundreds of tickets to make theaters appear sold out, to inflate its success.

      Several TikToks have gone viral showing “Sound of Freedom” theaters that were supposedly sold out completely empty once the movie begins.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      Surprised that only one of them has been rooted out so far. The whole movement is projection and deflection. There’s a serious problem of child abuse in right wing culture that they’re not willing to taking about.

  • quazar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I haven’t seen the film or heard much about it, only seen a preview before gaurdians but

    How is this film QAnon-adjacent?

    (and how is it that anti-pedophilia is now only a right wing thing when the church has been fucking children for decades? dont let em have it…)

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      A lot of the cast and crew and people who endorsed the movie are very into the whole Qanon thing, including Tim Ballard, the real guy the movie is about. The movie itself doesn’t actually promote any of that, though, (or at least, not that I could tell) and a good chunk is based on a real sting operation. There’s a lot of fiction, as is the case with most ‘based on a true story’ movies, though. And I haven’t checked, but I’m kind of suspicious of the charity they encourage you to donate to during the credits.

    • Blamemeta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well you see, its not. The left just wants it to be, so they say that it is anyways. Its called lying.

  • thantik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    According to the article, his lawyer states he was just essentially the landlord where a custodial dispute happened. So it sounds like something adjacent to the crime, such as lying to one of the parents about having seen the kid or something. Honestly, my parents got in custodial disputes, and I’ve even had one myself - I was so distraught over it that my emotions almost landed me in a similar situation. Luckily everything resolved itself (my wife thought I was having an affair due to her “friend” trying to convince her of such), but custodial disputes are not anywhere near ‘child sex trafficking’ levels of evil here…

    It’s also not surprising at all that none of the comments thus far have shown any level of critical thought about the article either…

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I wasn’t gonna read the article either tbh; but I embarrassed myself by spouting untrue information based off of the title of an article and being corrected publicly a few months ago so I’m trying to be better about making sure the information I “know” is correct.

    • atomdmac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      It makes me sad yo see this down voted with so little actual engagement with the content. Come on, Lemmy, you’re better than that!

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’ve learned that they really aren’t. I have seen this everywhere all week. All of the extremists of reddit seem to be the ones who hopped over, and they’re just as bad as qtards. Everyone is a troll, everyone is a bad faith actor to them, etc. Pretty much decided at this point that it’s just not worth attempting to engage with people online at all any more.

    • yanyuan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Especially since there is few public information so far. From the article:

      According to court records, the alleged kidnapping incident took place on July 21 but included few other details.

      […] Marta’s attorney told E! News that “the charges are unfounded.”

      “Mr. Marta had nothing to do with custodial kidnapping,” Scott Rosenblum told the outlet. “He was essentially a landlord.”

      Of course I don’t just believe the lawyer’s version either. However I don’t have enough information to scream “murder!”.