KEY POINTS
- Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, whom President-elect Donald Trump appointed to lead a new government efficiency team, said they intend to call federal employees back to the office five days a week.
- Companies such as Amazon and The Washington Post are adopting a similar policy in 2025.
- But many companies will keep remote or hybrid work arrangements, largely because they boost profits, economists said.
- Some view return-to-office mandates as a stealthy way to reduce employee head count.
Neither of these assholes have ever had a real job. Not even a high paying real job.
Billionaires are a problem.
As someone who was mostly remote since 2015 I’m pretty confused
Don’t try to make it make sense.
This never works well with propaganda.
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s entire existence is a privilege.
They thank us by directly using their endless wealth to fuck us out of our last bit of political/economic power
“I’ll be in the office when Elon is in the office.”
He needs us more than we need him.
he should probably let that sink in.
He just needs a firm reminder from a true patriot at the end of their rope.
I’ve been working remotely long before the pandemic and I will continue to do so - I’m far from being alone in that. Also, we are still in the “covid-era”, we just collectively decided to pretend we aren’t.
Elon after 2024/12/04:
Seems like he has a pretty exposed area there above the neck…
Well, Elon is smarter than that. That’s why you see him carrying little X on his shoulders everywhere now…
I worked at a national company of some fame for nearly 20 years. They have two main offices, one in the midwest and one in New England. Before COVID, it was common for folks to work from home, spread across the United States. We even had some fringe cases where people lived in England or Japan and worked from there. I don’t work there anymore, but I hear post covid they are forcing people to move and work from the office. It really is leadership brain rot, everywhere, regardless of industry.
Rip Disabled people I guess.
And this is coming from the same peoppe saying “just get a job”.
You gotta provide accomodations my guy.
First remote job I had was in 2010 making barely more than minimum wage for tier 1 phone support. These guys are off their rockers.
HE’S WORKING FROM FUCKING MARALAGO FUCK YOU
I’m “racist” against billionaires and not even pretending not to be. There’s like no more than a small handful who do much (relative % I mean) good for anybody. Those should be noted and tasted normally (if they weren’t while on the way up), but they should be taxed out of existence. Il
I don’t know what the number should be, but it shouldn’t be possible for your net worth to even approach a billion.
Probably smaller than $50M. Shouldn’t be possible to surpass that much. Even that amount should be heavily forced into charity.
If you’re in that upper echelon, I automatically hate you before I’ve heard of you, and I’m fairly confident the amount of times I’m wrong would be extremely small.
Super rich people have to prove they’re worth not hating. Their default position is “hated idiot” until proven otherwise.
There’s just so little possibility I wouldn’t want them dead in a vacuum (devoid of other moral considerations).
I can think of two billionaires that I’m tentatively okay with. One sold a software service for a dollar a year to a couple billion people, and the other is a musician with an extremely valuable musical portfolio and popular live shows.
The key part being that they almost entirely made their money by actually producing something themselves, not just leveraging money to make money or leeching off the work of others, and what they made actually provides value. $1 a year for communication services is a fair value, and the musician has easily provided more than a billion hours of enjoyment.I can’t think of anyone else that it seems reasonable to have that much money that actually has that much money.
and tasted normally
I agree we should eat the rich, but I’ll also admit that it’s a rare treat, so worth going all out on the seasoning and dining experience. At the least some fresh herbs and butter basted. :P
I’d cap it high enough so that you can obviously retire with a life of luxury, leave your children unquestionably provided for, and start a few odd businesses without realistically risking the previous points.
“Solving” you and your families material needs is sort of the endgame for wealth. The extra for random business ventures is because society actually benefits from people with safety nets taking risks to see if something makes money. It works better if we had a society wide safety net so failure doesn’t kill you, but even a limited form still has a benefit.Anything leftover shouldn’t go to charity, it should go back to the society that helped them get the money in the first place. Charity is good, but it’s ultimately a bandaid on social problems, and too often isn’t distributed evenly or without condition to those who need it. Taxes and entitlement programs won’t require a religious sermon to get food,
Still trying to look as cool as possible, and it doesn’t work when they do it, so they try harder, which makes it even worse. Dweebs.
What i don’t get in all of this: There are already companies that did go out of business because too many people just left, due to them not being able to do WFH. Personally, I do like going to the office 1-2 times a week, but even I would leave the company if the got rid of WFH completely. There’s near full employment everywhere, especially tech companies already have to go the extra mile to get people to work for them. Why would anyone stay at a company that does not do WFH, if that’s one thing they got to enjoy?
This is why they’re also fighting for those visas. They want to hire people but don’t want to pay US wages. And when your residency depends on your employment, you’re going to be much less likely to call out bullshit or whatever