How did you happen upon and learn it?

Imma add to this as they come up on a show I’m watching

  • KAYDUBELL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean, as a lawyer I had to take the evidence class in law school. Now I use it almost in a daily basis

        • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Not a law student, more an informal student of law lol. I am interested in law/politics on the side and want to see how people have encountered a niche topic of interest like just about every other of my posts haha

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Evidence at rest stays at rest, while evidence in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.

      • FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Honestly not sure when. It’s kinda an infamous one, it essentially says you can never introduce hearsay as evidence in a federal court because hearsay is unreliable… unless you fall into one of the 23 exceptions. Or you meet one of the two exceptions in FRE 807.

        Tbf a lot make good sense and are just about government written records and making sure you don’t need to find some government official who retired 10 years ago.

        Https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_803#

  • FrostyCaribou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    The business record exception to hearsay (ORS 40.460). I don’t generally use this rule, but when dealing with financial cases with a multitude of documents, it is very useful.

    Learned about it at law school and work.