• Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’d pay YouTube if it were $5/month instead of $15.

    In fact, a couple of my favorite YouTube creators are on nebula.tv and I pay them $30/year.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’d pay YouTube if it were $5/month instead of $15.

      It’s less than 5/month on the family plan IF you have 4 other people you’d like to share with

      The family plan is the only reason I pay for premium lol.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I pay $14CAD for Crunchyroll and I don’t even use it that much. I use hours and hours of Youtube content pretty much every day. I also had Nebula but need to get that sorted again now that they aren’t with Curiosity Stream.

      People will pay for a lot of stuff but ask them to pay for Youtube and they will lose their damn minds.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        YouTube doesn’t even produce their own content. I’d rather get it somewhere else, if creators offer that option.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sure, but considering just how much they need to store and serve to viewers at the highest speed I kinda get it. Look if it was $20CAD a month I’d definitely reconsider, and if they start putting ads in anyway I’ll cancel because I’m not paying to still see that shit, but for now it’s fine.

  • Blue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 months ago

    This can’t seriously be surprising for anybody, youtube with its on-demand unlimited video storage and streaming has to be one of the biggest money sinks on the internet.

    • pufferfisherpowder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      This kind of pisses me off whenever people complain about YouTube pushing ads or charging money. It’s absolutely insane how much storage and bandwidth the amount of video hosted and uploaded every second requires. How could it possibly free?!

      Bundled with YouTube Music it’s even extremely good value.
      Spotify premium costs USD15.36 in my country.
      YouTube premium, including YouTube music USD19.58.
      That’s USD4.23 for no ads where I watch the most videos. Absolute no brainer in my opinion.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      We all bought a free subscription to it for life with our data that they stole before we even had a sense of it being a problem.

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I scrape videos off of YouTube using Pinchflat which dumps them into a folder, predownloaded for me, which I then have connected to a Jellyfin server that splits each channel up as an individual series, ads and bumpers stripped entirely, and it automatically downloads videos as they release.

    Paying sounded too involved. Make a google account, etc…

    Who has the time?

  • Gutek8134@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ever heard of Elsevier? You pay them for the privilege of posting your article, and then they charge other people for the privilege of accessing it.

  • nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    not the first time capitalism asks you for money to solve problems capitalism created…

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    As a highly experienced software developer, I’m available for not writing software at a reduced rate of $45/hr, and I can handle unlimited overtime.

  • rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Meanwhile YouTubers don’t get paid enough so they still show you their ads.

  • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Still better than old school linear tv, where you paid to watch things being constantly interrupted by paid commercials.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    So you’re saying the audience for the ads have the people who are willing to pay for stuff, the very people the advertisers are paying to reach, removed from it.

    I wonder how much longer this will go before the advertisers catch on to that.

  • LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Back in the day most media was designed around commercial interruptions. Watch some old cartoons on Netflix, they often have “fade to black” moments after which the last 10 seconds are repeated. Nowadays commercials are algorithmically inserted into content to maximize viewership, meaning that more often then not a YouTube commercial will play right before the most important bit of the video.

    • Alex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Remember if you’re still using it despite that being the case: you’re the product.