Is this where Google gets to pretend that their news aggregation is about news or profit and not about running social experiments to see what tracks public interest or being in a position to shape public opinion by surfacing the news it chooses but also without paying for content?
They need some starter packs like BlueSky because all I’m seeing are some art photography highly likely ai generated - and I have no idea where to find content that has any value. On searching the hashtags I’m getting mastodon posts containing links that can’t be clicked.
How else do you convince bureaucrats and purse string holders that you are vital and need a bigger budget for next year?
You’d be right if they were minors - probably not in this case.
Depends on what he’s convicted of. There are certain convictions specifically prohibiting you from holding high office.
The law says, “Designing portable batteries in appliances in such a way that consumers can themselves easily remove and replace them;”
Key part being “in appliances”.
Hugo Boss
“violence” is when I’m not in absolute comfort - not when I shoot people, that’s my right.
Unfortunately for them too many people have caught up to this little charade. It’s too well known to pass muster.
Same. It’s a shame not enough weight is given in the interface or most intros. It’s really the best way to discover great content.
No worries, now the Florida government will offer their own insurance in retaliation, to show them corporates who’s boss.
And that’s how, children, the capitalists became socialists.
Search for hashtags then add them to your follows, that will show you any post with those hashtags, from there you can follow people that seem to interest you.
Also, the 3 remaining will be falling over themselves looking for a new job to get away from this toxic mf.
Tbf, Signal, and most modern chat clients with multi-device syncing are not great for opsec.
When it comes to privacy from mass surveillance or using your metadata to mine demographic preferences who you are talking to etc Signal sits at the top of generally available chat clients.
But it’s geared for the convenience and privacy of the average user not military security.
Eg: when it comes to group chats you just have to get one of the members of the chat to fall for a device syncing link, for then the whole group chat future messages to become available to the attacker. What’s more, no admin or other user of the chat gets to have approval or visibility privileges or notification of a new synced device for that chat or any info about the status of each of the devices on that chat.