Is your cucumber bitter? Throw it away. Are there briars in your path? Turn aside. That is enough. Do not go on and say “Why were things of this sort ever brought into this world?”
moving to https://discuss.tchncs.de/u/skillissuer
leftist conspiracy theories: the tonkin gulf incident was a setup, declassified documnets show so
right wing conspiracy theories: the gay satanist democrats are extracting fictional drug from abducted kids, in basement of this pizzeria, which has no basement. i know this from the most reliable source of all: mystic readings of 4chan
damn i wish all these conspiracy theorists were half as persecuted as they think they are
we don’t know yet, it might be very well a part of complete cure for some cases
and judging by mechanism which is pretty general, that might be a lot of cases and resistance may be hard to develop
superconductors do nothing to make batteries or CMOS more efficient
no
no
no
this thing would enable very strong superconducting magnets to work without cryogenic cooling. so, portable MRIs, better maglev, maybe perhaps easier fusion.
another interesting property is that resistance is zero. that means that you can transfer energy losslessly, saving some 10% of it this way. or you can make coils of this thing and charge/discharge them as needed, but this time without cooling: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_magnetic_energy_storage
yet another tool in oncologist toolbox, and looks like a pretty capable one. looks like it also has an effect of sensitizing cancer cells to other chemotherapy drugs
more technical writeup https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/new-mode-cancer-treatment
And also, you don’t need to use Fisher-Tropsch process either. Methanol is good enough fuel that you can get more directly from syngas and getting fractions of hydrocarbons this way is simply wasteful (tar formation, too light products etc). Additional benefit is easier conversion back to hydrogen if need be
That is, unless energy density is critical. I don’t think that difference matters in most of the cases
No. Haber-Bosch process is very mature by now and it doesn’t take much more energy than thermodynamically necessary to do so. You get there by recycling heat and reusing energy of compressed gases. The actual problem is getting that hydrogen in the first place
If you want to use hydrogen as a fuel anyway, you can add that little overhead and get fuel that you can either burn in ICE or go the whole nine yards, crack it back into elements and put that in fuel cells, and, more importantly, this comes with massive advantage of ammonia being about as easy to liquefy as propane, and we already have propane fuelled cars. Energy density is vastly higher than hydrogen this way, less than propane, sure, but it’s something
Another option is dimethyl ether, but this thing needs to take carbon from somewhere, just like methanol
I mean ammonia is pretty decent fuel in itself, it can be decomposed to hydrogen or burned as is
Methanol or ammonia, both are good
On Venus you also have several hundred, but this time it’s hot sulfuric acid
It’s not. Better worry about intelligent and malicious people
They don’t, FAQ states they don’t even have ability to do so
Crazy how long libertarians carried water for this piece of shit. Saudis need to spend billions of dollars in sports “sponsorship” and don’t get half the effect, but embezzle millions while branding it as “crypto adoption” and immediately milions of bozos without better cause flock to defend you
Reticulum network maybe? There was also Mycelium, but never got out of pre-alpha
the other factor is: who’s gonna touch this radioactive pile of bs?
americans you’ve got it only now?
most of solar energy comes in as visible light, does it reflect it?
deleted by creator