In 2003, the World Wide Web was still in its infancy. Dial-up connections were still the default and YouTube, Facebook, and Gmail had yet to be invented.
I’d argue it had reached its prime. Websites were just websites then, not data harvesting machines.
They shouldn’t. They’re not apologizing for what they’re doing, but are behaving like politicians, changing the rhetoric to try to get people to like what they’re going to do anyway.
Presumably the number of victims.
People are kept in prison without a conviction, for not affording bail. Owing a thousand times the lifetime earnings of other people should at the very least mean all your accounts and holdings are frozen, and you can’t spend anything without getting independent approval every time.
deleted by creator
I assumed it was for the sake of the passengers (and customers choosing their preference isn’t that big of a deal), but if it’s about the employees of the company not being safe, then the company’s not doing enough. For one, male drivers shouldn’t be left on their own to deal with assaulters.
This sounds like a PR move rather than dealing with the problems.
I still use my 2016 SE despite having a never phone. But I need pockets to carry that around, custom fit pockets if I want to be able to run with it without it being obstructive, because of how big even that old phone is.
They’re getting in the way of their own replacements, creating a hostile environment preventing people from working and gaining experience.
Even if you had like no morals at all, that type of behavior has to disqualify someone from being a surgeon. They’re sabotaging the work they’re supposed to be doing.
Music players in general haven’t been doing well. Phones are too big to be proper replacements for all uses.
Definitely the wrong thing to do, but also something that could be dealt with with a financial penalty and a sincere apology. When Masterson isn’t even admitting to his crimes, celebrities advocating for him is akin to what Will Smith did, using a position of privilege against the victims.
So, GOG release soon?
Fair enough. It’s not like we need everyone to personally survey every landmark, especially with everyone sharing everything they do.
If anything, if you’re going there to take a picture of it, you shouldn’t be allowed in. Look at someone else’s, if that’s the important part.
I signed up for Facebook for the first time ever, to comment on a local page about a local issue, and was first banned by Facebook for nothing in particular. Had to put in a phone number to reactivate. Also found I wasn’t able to post if I included a link, a link to a government website, but I guess that’s a very basic spam filter for new accounts. Then made some comments back and forth with no one really talking to me. Then about a week later with no activity, my account had been banned again, and now Facebook wants a photo. I don’t even have photos online, and I don’t see how they could use that to verify my identity, so that’s where I stopped.
How is there more than one? Unless you need something slightly unusual like a static IP. Otherwise, everything should be covered by type of subscription, cost of subscription.
That’s still just $36.5 million a year, that should be the daily rate for a company the size of Facebook.
Not doing business in a country that is not your own is the easiest thing anyone can do.
It used to be 13.7 billion years± a big margin that got narrowed down to 13.8± a smaller margin. Not seeing that changing unless there’s something seriously wrong with the previous research.
It is just a tool, if a writer can use it, why not? But without the writers and the involvement of humans to verify and edit the work, might as well just have the public use their own AI units instead of paying a studio for something they didn’t put any hours into.