Where’s “here”?
Lemmy doesn’t have centralized moderation or administration. You’d have to bring it up with the admins (or mods, if applicable) of the server that it’s hosted on.
Otherwise, your only recourse is to inquire with the admins of your server (lemmy.world) to see if they’re interested in defederating from that instance due to the kinds of communities they have.
Isn’t making things themselves what restaurants are supposed to be doing? Not always, but a good restaurant would, at least.
They took your use of “everyone” personally, I think
Now I’m genuinely confused what made it homemade…haha
Was the restaurant attached to a home?
I wonder if the people has believed the 5g conspiracy fantasies feel remotely foolish
They don’t. In fact, they don’t believe they were wrong. They’ve cherry-picked their array of half-truths and benign or unprovable conspiracy theories and have never reevaluated since. Or they’ve morphed their beliefs into cheap versions of the nonsense they once took as true.
Even with the covid vaccine conspiracy theories. They were saying that everyone who took the vaccine would die.
To maintain their “rightness”, when questioned, they will point to the statistics of the non-zero number of people who did die from taking the vaccine.
When pointed out that the actual number is much closer to 0 than the 100% that they had been saying in 2021 or so, they will argue that there’s a coverup or something. Or that they didn’t literally mean 100% of people.
Obviously they meant whatever would make them right. Some people can hardly fathom the fact that they believed something to be incorrect.
Which makes it even harder, as the dictionary definitions may suggest that they’re still used that way in popular usage. I haven’t heard “incredible” used negatively or neutrally (except ironically) in my entire life, which did begin in the 20th century.
I figured, which is the only reason I mentioned it!
Given the context, it seemed like the intent was different than simply “to a large extent”
“incredible” is not usually used to mean “not credible” (or “not believable”) in English. It usually means “really good”. I’d go with “unbelievable” or “insane”, personally.
This might just be a North American thing though.
You’re right; I just don’t think the law goes far enough
This is my problem with American products. The standards are too low! Sugar is replaced with corn. The cream in ice cream is replaced with oil. Chocolate is replaced with unrelated fats. And it’s all legally allowed to be sold as what they’re a facsimile of!
At best, there are names like “chocolatey”. Bullshit.
My least favourite alternative that Nestle loves is just leaving what it is off the package. So here in Canada, it doesn’t say ice cream. It doesn’t say anything unless you look for the fine print.
But it’s in an ice cream carton sitting a metre away from real ice cream. This is false marketing by omission. If I wrote the laws, this would be illegal.
That can also be an age thing. Sweet things can taste more overly sweet as an adult, especially if you’ve been removing sweet things from other parts of your life.
he quit all hard alcohol and wine and not just drinks about an 8 pack a night
…is that not borderline alcoholic? And also a ton of calories?
Why did you write “hunter2” so many times?
waiting hours to almost have a day in the emergency waiting room.
I think if you’re waiting that long in the emergency room, you might be in the wrong place. Or unlucky. And/or in a place that’s understaffed and underfunded.
Most emergencies can’t wait an entire day.
Sometimes if protests are annoying, it drives away people who could have been swayed to your side.
Especially when reactance is a strong and relatively common social phenomenon.
This is a bit of a questionable article. I gave a search for the quoted word “exploit”/ed from the title, and it didn’t have any hits in the article. So I’m not sure where it’s coming from.
The article doesn’t actually confirm that the data in Pokemon Go was used in military operations or for military technologies, but it does share the opinion of one person who believes it to be so.
But because this agrees with a bunch of people’s suspicions, people are accepting it at face value.