oo1

How dumb is a person to define a “career moment” as buying something.

Aren’t careers are suppoed to be about creating things that other people want to buy.

ew, i dont want to touch one of thoser with my bare hands though.

i 'd avoid the vole, i had pet rats.
if an enraged rodent decides to use it’s infinitely regowing incisor powers on you, you’re gonna bleed.

rents are driven by mortgage rates now - what the fuck.
I can just hear those fucking thatcherites and blairites shitting out their free market rhetoric all over the place.

still, people keep voting for it, so it must be working for the upper middle .

ai ain’t going to be much “worse” or “better” than humans.

but re earlier points I don’t think things should be judged on a timescale of a few years.
relevant timescales are more like generation(s) to me.

or they could offer people a discount to sign up to use an ‘unstable’ branch, release stuff there for a couple of weeks to prove it before inflicting untested updates on the unsuspecting full price customers.

I just hope they’ve put in a testing procedure.
i don’t understand how they can be releasing updates so frequently.
the game wont get less bugged if they’re just playing whack-a-mole.

relying on user testing is okay when its in pre-release. but by now they should be testing properly before releasing updates.

@iasip delicious nose clams!

i want to go back in time to coin-op arcades and pay per pla . . . oh hang on

you probably have to convince more people with those views to switch away from their other social media.

i suspect moderate conservative people are maybe more likely to stay with status quo/ monolithic / non-distributed services, so there won’t be as many moving to a new looser open source thing.

like i bet linux / open source / foss users are a little bit more likely to be liberal or socialist (or DGAFs) - at least insofar as they’re choosing on principles of ownership and user rights rather than affordability - its sort of linked-in to those licenses which inherently disempower the individual creator of the IP (vs say a patent) and empower the end users and people who want to reuse the IP in a different ways. That’s basically a liberal ownership model vs a capitalist one - to grossly oversimply.

conservatives are maybe more likely to be buying proprietary services from microsoft, oracle, or amazon/google ( pay someone else to run your linux /postgres for you!), if they’re happy eating all that shit from them, reddit is probably fine.

the gum is the worm, the worm is the gum.

do you live on the equator?

Paddy’s dollars.

searx

yeah, people lose so much credibility when they don’t even control for simple easy things.

there will always be some confounding factors, but doing rate per population, is rarely hard - andneeded over decade comparisons.

demographic risk adjustment is more complex, so i’d not expect that. but if it is at least acknowledged, then the article is more credible and will get more (of my) attention.

media (and i guess their audience) seem to enjoy hype though . . .

oh shit this is the f.t. i used to think they were among the more credible journo’s. pity.

oh right. i thought it was about copyright

barring a complete redesign of intellectual property law from its very foundation.

lets just hope theres no media empire with a legion of mouse-eared lawyers champing at the bit to do such a thing.

similarly i’d be a bit worried that any new legislation would be more strongly influenced by those rights-holding interest groups rather than consumers.

Imagine someone in 50 years who wants a rom from the 80s. will they be able to get it easily?

It’d be nice if it was as easy as getting hold of a brothers grimm story.