

I’ve seen at least three articles on this topic, and none of them seem to say what the sanctions are. It could be anything from denying entry to the US to freezing her bank accounts.
I’ve seen at least three articles on this topic, and none of them seem to say what the sanctions are. It could be anything from denying entry to the US to freezing her bank accounts.
In the article it explains that some states allow people without immigration status to enroll using state funds.
And the poorest will feel that $1600 painfully. The richest won’t even notice the $12000.
When I was in high school, gay was the generic negative word. If Wendys gave you a medium fry when you ordered a large - gay. If your homie cancelled plans last minute - gay. If you slipped on the stairs and busted your ass - gay. It’s bizarre in hindsight.
Honestly what are you talking about?
More than Abrego Garcia? Probably because he had a court order not to be deported.
The permanent veto holding members of the security council are specifically those countries capable of starting a nuclear conflict. Those vetos are expressly for reducing the risk of that happening. Not saying the world can’t do better today, but let’s remember why it is the way it is.
I don’t see the interest in who voted what on my stuff, but it could be interesting to do some analysis of system-wide voting behaviors. The bigger Lemmy gets the more of a problem it’s going to have with bots. People will need to create tools to identify these bots, and voting behavior seems like the primary data source.
There have been two court orders requiring that payments continue normally. It looks like Musk has decided that court orders do not bind him. It hasn’t even been two weeks and already we’re at the constitutional crisis?
Utter nonsense
We should have culled all these cows, and kept culling them until nobody and nothing tested positive. And done it all a year ago. But apparently that was too hard, and now it’s really just luck whether this becomes the next global catastrophe.
I was curious how often this actually happened and found this other article with some figures.
https://www.iosconews.com/news/state/article_3280a3fa-bc08-54ae-80e1-a92d10aab51b.html
“More than 5,400 minors were married in Michigan between 2000 and 2021, according to the nonprofit Unchained at Last. More than nine in 10 of the minors were girls, with 12 under the age of 16.”
So I guess it was mostly 16 and 17 year olds who now have to wait to 18.
Oh good, a petition.
No one is obligated to patronize any business or artist (generally speaking). Obligation isn’t the issue. But it sounds like, yes, you choose not support/patronize artists who have certain opinions you disapprove of.
I’ve seen this sentiment floating around the Internet sometimes, and it always strikes me as very limiting.
You really apply some kind of ideology test when choosing which artist’s work to enjoy?
EDIT: Perhaps this hinges on what you mean by “support”
Quite right. I did get one with speakers, but they were even worse than I expected. I bought a sound bar to go with it. There are also a few quirks that remind me it’s a commercial display. Like there’s no power button on the unit. I have to use the remote. I suppose one wouldn’t want their signage turned off by randos.
I went on that journey a couple years ago. What I ended up buying is technically considered “digital signage” rather than a TV. Basically zero bloat. You may have to pay a little extra but I don’t recall it being that much. Pretty sure I got it here.
Whatever happened to that lawsuit trying to block arbitrary executive tariffs? The law that Trump is using to threaten all these tariffs has a set of causes listed, something like emergency economic events, price shocks, crashes, etc. I’m sure prosecution of the president’s friends is not on the list.
Here it is https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-court-blocks-trumps-liberation-day-tariffs-2025-05-28/
But that was a month ago.