You’re right, that’s not just technically untrue. The board voted with their wallet, by giving him even more money than ever, so he could continue doing what he is doing. The people on the board wouldn’t give a shit if only Nazis buy their cars, as long as there’s enough of them to keep buying.

Hey you! You’re finally awake!

“And I think that that’s going to be just very exciting for the…”

Plebs? He almost slipped lol

A true visionary. Thank you for your contributions to the local network that benefinutted from those actions 🤘

I’m gonna take a wild guess that the games with high budgets that aren’t “selling”, are just not selling “enough” to cover the “costs” of the executives. I guess it wasn’t much of a guess:

and they’re not selling nearly as well as expected," Sweeney said. "Whereas other games are going incredibly strong

Do they think that these other games “going incredibly strong” are making the money they hope to make? They’re probably making much less but managing it much better. The savings are almost infinite when you don’t approve every executive bonus pay package.

“new experience” = new mtx experiences

… “bad for the stability and longevity” of the shareholders. If a publicly traded company tried anything other than “line go up”, it might still be stable and long lasting.

🤣🤣 literally the only reaction to this!!

Valorant has skins that can only be acquired in their $80+ bundles too. Following the valorant trend, they know some people will keep paying, no matter the price.

This article is talking about how Sony’s service is “only a year old”?? What are they talking about? I thought this was about PS plus, which I’m pretty sure I had bought many years ago, not 1 year ago.

There are stretch goals that go all the way to 65 million, and then it stops there. Since it’s obvious those goals were reached a LONG time ago, does anyone know if those are already in the game?