

Could you please define exactly what you mean by “left-wing”?
All of this user’s content is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Could you please define exactly what you mean by “left-wing”?
Given my personal preference for the Uniball Vision Needle (not pictured), I’ll go for 1.
An interesting alternative that I’ve found (for when making English breakfast or something similar) is to steep the teabag in the milk first before adding the hot water. I find that it cuts down on the bitterness and makes a much smoother tea.
I swear, that text looks both blurry and sharp at the same time.
I don’t understand the relevance of including the age in the headline. To me, it reads like the general counsel was objecting the access given to the DOGE rep because they are 23 years old. Yet, from what I can see, the article doesn’t seem to outline any such objection.
I don’t think this behavior should be socially tolerated; however, I don’t think it’s a good idea to police it through the use of governmental force.
[…] it doesn’t remove admins from the equation and users still have to choose an instance to be associated with […]
I think that’s a fair point! At any rate, I do agree with you in that I think that users should be completely portable for a truly sustainable federated service.
It could be done without having to clone all data though. Reddit is hosted by AWS and their data is distributed on multiple servers, so replace AWS by a bunch of people like you and me providing disk space for the data and tada, you can decentralized the database and just give people access to interacting with it directly (through code) or via various front-ends that people would create. […]
If I understand you correctly, there is an open issue for Lemmy for an, I think, similar idea of co-hosting communities.
[…] they’re always using the same credentials no matter the website they use and no matter the website they can interact with everything that ever happened on the servers, no one has the power to prevent users from seeing some of the transactions that happened (no admins) because the website they use are just a front used to simplify interaction with the servers. […]
Hm, IIUC, this is one of Bluesky’s issues that the linked blog post was pointing out — if joining the network requires one to mirror all existing data, it makes it prohibitively expensive for anyone to spin up a server to join the network if the size of the network is enormous.
If things were decentralized in similar way to crypto it would be way better for user adoption.
IIUC, are you perhaps referring to something like Nostr?
Oh damn, that’s a lot of cross-posts. I didn’t know this had already been posted so many times before.
Isn’t that for U.S. law? Given that the law in the post is a Canadian law, I think it would be better to have a Canada-specific source.
[…] the fraud usually has to be something a reasonable person could believe. […]
Could you cite a source for that?
genuinely great answer. […]
Thank you 😊
[…] thanks.
You’re welcome 😊
Personally, I’ve come to despise the “How’re you?” greeting — it feels like it normalizes impersonal interactions and encourages the behavior of masking one’s emotions. When someone asks “How are you?” I want that sentence to actually carry the emotional weight that it verbally masquerades. So, if someone says “How are you?”, I just respond with a generic greeting like “Hi”.
Canada had anti-fraudulent witchcraft laws.
I’ll update the title accordingly. I think it’s important to specify what you’ve stated, for clarity.
Workman