Summary

A new book, Ricardo’s Dream by Nat Dyer, reveals that Sir Isaac Newton’s wealth was closely tied to the transatlantic slave trade during his tenure as master of the mint at the Bank of England.

Newton profited from gold mined by enslaved Africans in Brazil, much of which was converted into British currency under his oversight, earning him a fee for each coin minted.

While Newton’s scientific legacy remains untarnished, the book highlights his financial entanglement with slavery, a common thread among Britain’s banking and finance elites of the era.

  • MrNesser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    By our standards he may have been a peice of crap.

    At the time he was born in the society he lived in his wealth gained in a largley accepted manner.

    I see no need to go back over history constantly bringing this shit up.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nah, by their standards, he was a colossal piece of crap too. He was very much disliked. He was known to be humorless and just kind of a jerk overall. He was also pretty useless a lot of the time. He was elected to parliament and only spoke one time during his tenure there. He said, “the window needs closing.” Really.

      And then when he took over the mint, he was just ruthless in prosecuting anyone he could for any reason he could find. He had a witch hunt for counterfeiters after there was a change in coinage. It was pretty nuts. So yeah, he was always a piece of shit. This just makes him a bigger piece of shit.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah, this seems like a strange connection to make. “He was in charge of the mint, and the mint used gold, and a lot of gold at that time came from Brazil, which used SLAVERY to mine it!”

      Like, yes, this is true, but it’s a connection to slavery only insofar as every major economic actor at the time was connected to slavery in some way.

  • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Did anyone bother to read this article?

    1. No one is calling to cancel him
    2. Dyer explicitly says an epochal thinker
    3. Dyer then says he was apart of his time
    4. And the last third of the article is quotes from other academic all like “That groks.” Or “matches what I researched in this corner.”
    • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      If anything, all I can really imagine that’s necessary is to not worship him. Kind of like when you get out of grade school and find out that the US founding fathers were not in fact gods, but disgusting men that were products of their time.