When I eat chicken, I call it chicken. Chicken wing; chicken drumsticks etc.

When I eat lamb, I call it lamb. Lamb shank; lamb cutlets.

So why do I not eat pig or cow? I eat pork or beef. Is there a reason for that?

  • whenigrowup356@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    2 years ago

    My understanding is that the difference in terms goes back to the Norman invasion, which is when a ton of French-based terms for things were carried over.

    The peasants referred to everything as the name of the animal but the French nobles referred to it as porc, boeuf, etc. This is also where we got the words for venison, mutton, veal, poultry, and also apparently pheasant

    • zzzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      2 years ago

      To add to this, the rich (i.e., French-speaking) consumed the most butchered meat, by far. So, it came to be that butchered meat for sale would be labeled in French, while the live animals, which were tended by (English-speaking) peasents retained their English names.

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Piggybacking off of this, “venison” comes from a Latin word meaning “to hunt” and was originally used as more of a catch-all term for game meats. You might have deer venison, boar venison, rabbit venison, etc. Over time it came to mostly be used to refer to deer

    • UnknownQuantity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      My country had not been invaded by the Normans and we speak completely different language, yet we don’t call it pig or cow either.

      • whenigrowup356@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you don’t mind my asking, which language is yours?

        It’s an interesting question to ponder which different languages ended up with distinction words for the meat vs the living animal, and maybe what that says about the culture.

        The distinction is not a feature of French, from what I understand, and English ending up with this distinction seems to have been entirely accidental.

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 years ago

    If it involves food or the culinary arts, then chances are good France and the French language is involved.

  • Nioxic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    We do in Denmark.

    The english words are different because…

    The farmers would call it by its english name. And the king and other fancy people would use the french.

    Pig becomes porc

    For example.

    Eventually this meant that when the animal was alive youd call it by the english name. And when it was butchered you used the french name.

    Or so i read once.

  • ren (a they/them)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    Tagger below explains it but also wanted to chime in that chicken is often “poultry”, but over time, we became comfortable with “chicken”.

    • Andy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      True. I think someone else pointed this out as well. But I don’t eat a poultry drumstick. The English language is a funny thing!

      • bcron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Beef only refers to cow and pork only refers to pig, but poultry encompasses many species of fowl, and I think that the need for distinction is what led to people generally referring to poultry by the species. If you tell someone you’re having poultry for dinner the follow-up is usually ‘what kind?’, and if beef referred to the meat of any large domestic quadriped mammal and bison were more popular, we’d probably refer to it as ‘cow’, that kind of thing.

  • Andy@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fascinating! Thank you all for the answers! I got an F in French at high school, which might explain why I hadn’t made the connection.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s because of the Norman conquest of England. Basically, the ruling nobility spoke French and the lower classes spoke English. The peasants who were in charge of livestock spoke English so pig, cow, and chicken stuck around. But it was mostly the upper classes who ate the meats so they used French words at the dinner table (beef from boeuf, pork from porc, poultry from poulet, etc.).

  • *Tagger*@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    As I understand it, after the norman invasion in 1066, generally the Saxon (Germanic speaking) people reared the animals so the names for the animals come from the German language, but the norman (French speaking) people eat the animals so the names for the meat generally derive from the French language.

  • ABCDE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Adoption from French, I assume. I would say sheep for the animal and lamb for the meat, though.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      lamb is the young animal. Sheep raised for meat don’t live long enough to not be lamb, though. old animals tend to produce tougher meat. (as apposed to sheep raised for wool production.)

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m also confused as to why English-speaking people in general, at least in the U.S. and Britain, are fine with eating sheep but not goat. Goat is one of those exotic meats the foreigners eat for some reason. I’ve never even had the opportunity to try goat. Could it be all that different?

    • AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Goat is a bit of an acquired taste. That’s why it’s usually heavily spiced and stewed or slow cooked. And it’s not like people eat a ton of mutton, either.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s different in the same way that pheasant is different to chicken or wild pork is different to farmed pork.

      In other words a stronger taste.