According to GIMPS, this is the first time a prime number was not found by an ordinary PC, but rather a “‘cloud supercomputer’ spanning 17 countries” that utilized an Nvidia A100 GPU chip to make the initial diagnosis. The primary architect of this find is Luke Durant, who worked at Nvidia as a software engineer for 11 years

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    Me wondering why I haven’t been able to deploy cloud instances with the A100 for an actual useful purpose for the past month

  • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I don’t understand this and therefore it’s stupid and pointless. Fuck you math elitist assholes with your so-called “large” prime numbers spending billions of dollars that could be used to make my life better. I don’t comprehend this at all and there it does not matter. The end.

    • el_abuelo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Is this Poe’s law? I genuinely thought this was satire but the downvotes and responses are very serious!

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      If Jesus had wanted us to use prime numbers why did he turn the water into wine and not numbers? Checkmate atheists. /s

    • wieson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you want it to be useful for the economy and industry in order to warrant funding, I’ve got news for you:

      The majority of modern encryption relies on prime numbers. It is currently speculated but not known, that the number of prime numbers is infinite.

      Should it be proven, that there are only a finite amount of prime numbers, all encryption would become vulnerable.

    • pftbest@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is a very dangerous way of thinking. You cannot tell at the time of discovery if specific research will be useful or not down the line. You need to advance the research in all directions, even if some of them seem silly or useless, or else you will handicap your progress in other fields which you didn’t see the connection with at first.

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      If we can analyze larger primes, we can generate larger primes which has applications in math, particularly cryptography and other areas, not even beginning to look at number theory. Specifically being able to verify them over a cloud is useful, we can generate them quicker and worry about their safety less. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hensel’s_lemma has uses in physics actually.

      Oh, you mean you don’t understand it, gotcha.

      Yes, and Bayesian statistics are useless too, they’re all about things that have already happened!

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        47
        ·
        6 months ago

        No. I understand it plenty. Quantifying shit to the Nth degree doesn’t fix anything. It makes math more precise, but math that will never be used for any practical applications.

        Please inform me about the ways this information and “breakthrough” will be used in a meaningful way that matters at all.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          They literally told you how it’s used for practical applications and you just ignored it. It makes cryptography stronger, hence your password less likely to be broken. National secrets less likely to be leaked. Your identity less likely to be stolen.

          • el_abuelo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            I wouldn’t bother arguing with this person. They’re either trolling or intentionally ignorant - either way, you will lose to their vast experience.

        • Wren@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          math that will never be used for any practical applications.

          Ummmmm…… what?

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes. The amount of effort and resources used to do this shouldn’t just be a fucking waste.

        This is a fucking waste. Proper fucking waste.

        Nobody will use this math in our lifetime. Probably not the next generation either. We’re incapable of using it in any meaningful way except bragging rights.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s not a presumption when there is no basis for it all. It’s a fucking fact.

            If there was a segment of society that said “Hey, we really want to do this thing, but we really just need the highest prime number possible! Why won’t anyone find that for us?” Then I’d say OK.

            You’ve got a guy out to beat a record and get his name on the books here. Useless.