• randomaccount43543@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    205
    ·
    2 years ago

    Just a word of caution: Non-peer reviewed, non-replicated, rushed-looking preprint, on a topic with a long history of controversy and retractions. So don’t get too excited yet.

    • ViridianNott@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Okay so I agree that it needs to be peer reviewed and independently verified before we can trust it. But how exactly does the preprint look rushed?