• halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not just new evidence. There was never any physical evidence linking him to the crime at all, according to the articles I’ve seen so far looking into it.

  • Cyv_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Execution shouldn’t be an option. At least with life in prison you can release a person if you fucked up, with significant financial compensation for their time in prison. You can’t un-execute a person. The state isn’t competent enough to be given such power. Nobody is.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      The purpose of the US legal system is not to provide justice. It’s to terrorise poor people and minorities. So, it worked just fine here.

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    South Carolina executed a man on death row on Friday, days after the key witness for the prosecution came forward to say he lied at trial and the state was putting to death an innocent man.

    “New evidence” seems to be underselling the matter. How in the fuck could they justify not even granting a delay??

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The Rev Hillary Taylor, executive director of South Carolinians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, said the flaws in Allah’s case were a reminder that “the death penalty is not given to the ‘worst of the worst’, it is given to the people who are least able to represent themselves in court”

    Salient words.