I trust the summaries on my searches as much as I already know or can verify, like any tool, but I don’t log into them. I use the anon ones like duck.ai and lumo and if it limits my usage then time to go anyway. If they track me somehow it doesn’t really matter since I do no harm and come in peace.
They don’t know how any of it works, and have no reason to ever learn now that they have a magic box, so of course they’re going to do whatever the magic box tells them as long as the magic box gives them what they want.
Claude Code is not a LLM. It’s a regular application communicating with an LLM. It might be very vibe coded, seeing who it is written by, but it’s not an LLM that’s the problem here.
The bad application design here is allowing an unreliable LLM write access to your repo and to the internet.
And absolutely the LLM is the problem.
You know the LLM gets stuff wrong, yet you put it in charge. Sooner or later, it’s inevitably going to go very, very wrong.
People were wrong to trust it, people read all the stories of it going wrong, and I don’t understand why anybody still does trust LLMs.
It always was a decision to outsource your most valuable thinking to a subscription controlled by companies who were so obviously on the initial stages of an enshittification journey. Why else were they pushing it so very hard?!
“Yeah, sure, some of its towers fall down, but look how fast it builds them, and look at how heavily below cost the initial subscription is! Let’s replace all our institutional knowledge and experience with a random sentence generator that ate stackoverflow! Yay!”
I don’t understand why people vote for narcissistic, fraudulent, criminal, child-raping bullies, either. It was so clearly and obviously going to go wrong.
I don’t understand why people trust LLMs.
They probably don’t, they just want to get shit done.
I trust the summaries on my searches as much as I already know or can verify, like any tool, but I don’t log into them. I use the anon ones like duck.ai and lumo and if it limits my usage then time to go anyway. If they track me somehow it doesn’t really matter since I do no harm and come in peace.
They don’t know how any of it works, and have no reason to ever learn now that they have a magic box, so of course they’re going to do whatever the magic box tells them as long as the magic box gives them what they want.
Claude Code is not a LLM. It’s a regular application communicating with an LLM. It might be very vibe coded, seeing who it is written by, but it’s not an LLM that’s the problem here.
It’s just bad application design.
The bad application design here is allowing an unreliable LLM write access to your repo and to the internet.
And absolutely the LLM is the problem.
You know the LLM gets stuff wrong, yet you put it in charge. Sooner or later, it’s inevitably going to go very, very wrong.
People were wrong to trust it, people read all the stories of it going wrong, and I don’t understand why anybody still does trust LLMs.
It always was a decision to outsource your most valuable thinking to a subscription controlled by companies who were so obviously on the initial stages of an enshittification journey. Why else were they pushing it so very hard?!
“Yeah, sure, some of its towers fall down, but look how fast it builds them, and look at how heavily below cost the initial subscription is! Let’s replace all our institutional knowledge and experience with a random sentence generator that ate stackoverflow! Yay!”
I don’t understand why people vote for narcissistic, fraudulent, criminal, child-raping bullies, either. It was so clearly and obviously going to go wrong.