• prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If AI makes you twice as productive, and there’s fewer taxes on spending money for tokens than there is for spending money on salaries, the rational amount for a corporation to spend on it is more than a human’s entire salary, per person working with it.

    Naively assuming corporations approximate rational actors, and AI does measurably improve productivity, this implies a gain of roughly 2% if these employees are earning federal minimum wage, or well below 1% if they earn average software developer wages.

    Maybe their contract deliverables are poorly suited to this use case or something, but if they are given a fixed amount of money to produce some software item, then it makes sense to prioritize productivity per dollar.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      How many companies allow their employees to also be employed by their competitors?

      Your idea of an AI being like an employee only if there’s an AI company that will agree to an exclusive contract or at the very least respect data ownership and respect privacy. Is there an AI company that’s like that?