Google tells me that: “HireRight reports social media comments to employers only if the prospective employer explicitly requests and pays for a social media background screening package as part of their pre-employment check”
Anyone in recruiting in the US ever seen candidates not hired because of their social media posts being too pro human rights?
Anti-Israel, or anti-genocide? Because with the current global events and zionists going off on the slightest provocation this terminology is very suspicious
little late in reply here, but I dont see that any honest person can separate Israel from genocide. The Nakba started on minute one of Israels existence and they violated the standards of partition and balfour immediately. It was a racist ethnic cleansing warcrime from the first minute. There is no peaceful version of Israel thats now or ever possible. Its a terrorist cabal and “Israelis” who “settled” in that area that was already settled by its rightful owners need to be “settled” someplace else. We need restorative justice for the mass murdered. If some native born “Israelis” are inconvenienced by that, well too bad, its the least awful thing that would have happened so far and owners of stolen property are obliged to give it back even if its inconvenient.
If they wont leave they need to be made to leave. Its not their land – it never was and they are racist criminals.
It should be a step back from that. Israel is committing genocide so you can’t be anti-genocide and pro-israel.
But Israel is trying really hard to pretend like they represent all Jews and Judaism in general, so to conflate anti-isreali and anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism.