• Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It’s funny how things have shifted from people complaining about citing Wikipedia to people citing AI. Now Wikipedia may as well be the gutenberg

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I think part of that has been actual elevated standards on Wikipedia with a more robust culture for things like citations, but probably more importantly, it’s readers already being expected to understand that Wikipedia isn’t an inherently credible source and needs checking if you actually care.

      Of course part of it now too, as you imply, is generative AI making it look more rigorous by comparison and lowering people’s standards.

      • FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’m lazy and have started treating wikipedia as a primary source. But if I’m quoting it to somebody else, I tend to look at the cited references to make sure I trust those.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      The Wikimedia Foundation has very little to do with what goes on on the English Wikipedia. It hosts the infrastructure, puts some legal policies in place, and really from there, the community-elected administrators (who are themselves active contributors) are the ones who handle enforcement, and the rules are discussed by the community.

      Even the administrators don’t exercise all that much power. In ten years, I think I’ve seen the office have to step in exactly one time – for a possible libel issue when even the administrators couldn’t agree with each other.

  • lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I still have that Google newsfeed enabled on my phone, just trying to stay informed. The AI overview is actually hella useful, by summarising all the news reports and circumventing the trash clickbait

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      You know, you’re getting downvoted for this, and I get why, but I also think you should’ve been offered a suggestion: RSS feeds. They let you get your news from good, reliable sources that aren’t The Daily Beast talking about “Elon Musk drops SHOCKING new post on X (did he shit his pants??)” Unironically, it’s the best way to keep up with the news bar none. I can even give you personalized suggestions if you’d like.

      Your problem is real. Your problem is not your fault. Your solution is understandable. I just think it’s misguided.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Wikipedia is suspect now too. They’ve sold the site to AI search. Hard to say that they had much of a choice, but the sure did it swiftly and gleefully.