I’ve been thinking. Every mainstream social media is age verificated now. But sites such as SomethingAwful, 4chan and the Fediverse weren’t. So why are we trying to populate it if the Fedi’ was popular too, we would ALSO be verificated and spywared (made up this word for this post’s sake)?

  • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    What law? Where? How could it even be enforced on something completely decentralized?

    They could go after some locally hosted instances I guess but the federated platforms as a whole do not have a “home base” and trying to enforce such a rule would be difficult if not impossible in practice (never mind that age verification was never about protecting anybody).

  • eicker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Probably. Regulators usually care about reach, not architecture. If the Fediverse became genuinely mainstream, it would likely end up in the same political spotlight. The real difference is that federation makes compliance an instance by instance problem, not one global switch. That is much harder to enforce.

  • terabyterex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    thats not how it works. there is no company. if your server tries to age gate me, i’ll just use another.

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    You can just join another instance that is outside the jurisdiction of these laws or run your own instance with closed sign ups since you don’t have to verify your own age (or the age of known friends if you offer access to them)

    The fediverse is inherently resilient to this sort of law, it’s the laws that make platforms liable for the content posted to it, that are more of a concern for the fediverse.