I don’t really choose my travel destinations based on traffic safety.
By the same logic, I should travel to Nigeria as often as I can because there are a lot fewer moose attacks there than where I live.
A single metric should not determine a travel destination
I usually only look for amount of princes willing to give me money as a metric, but i guess it would be better to add amount of moose attacks as a metric as well, thanks!
All of those top cities full of sprawl with high speed strodes. High speed strodes are famous for being more dangerous. They’re basically a highway with a sidewalk.
Nah, come to Baltimore. It ain’t even on this list
If you are walking the streets of Phoenix on your vacation then you are fucking regarded.
I would say it’s better to visit NYC just because it’s just better than those other 3 cities, unless you visiting in the winter, then maybe go South.
