Creating a Utopian City Is Harder Than Tech Billionaires Think::The man who created Sandy Springs, Georgia, has some advice for those who want to a build a metropolis in northern California.
It’s really hard to exploit everyone for personal gain and still call it a utopia.
Well no shit. A billionaire is evil per definition. I wouldn’t expect an evil person to know how (or want) to create a utopia. Any ideals they’d come up with ought be heavily scrutinised.
Doesn’t everyone learn in school that utopias can’t exist.
Joe loves dogs and hates cats, Susie loves cats and hates dogs… utopia over.
Apparently “utopian communities” are actually intentional communities following a utopian model and they don’t like to be referred to as “utopian communities” because it’s considered prejorative.
Here’s a list of utopian communities in the US, btw: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_utopian_communities
I don’t know what this means. What is a utopian model? If they don’t like people using that name, why do they call it that?
I tried searching, but various things came up, including utopian socialism. Since the city in the article mentioned hiring private companies to do everything, I can only assume that’s not it.
Yea those aren’t utopian. They can call themselves whatever they want but it doesn’t make it true.
Utopia means place that doesn’t exist. Gimme a Eutopia.
These tech billionaires don’t understand what utopia really is, for starters.
Because if they understand, they know utopia cannot exist…
And since their billionaire interests are at such odds with ours, they might be uniquely unqualified for that task…
I keep yelling “on screen!” at my wall, but nothing happens.
