• eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    AI is an amazing tool for fascists.

    Annihilate private access to computing, censor and rewrite all comms, destroy free software and the last remnants of education…

    Every single decision made for evil.

    And all these vendors who are locking themselves into one customer are about to learn why that’s a bad idea.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    How has this whole saga not been an obvious indictment of ‘the free market?’

    Big players shouldn’t be allowed to gobble up all the resources needed by small ones. How is it not obvious that they need to wait until production increases to meet their needs before embarking on their little project?

  • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    16 days ago

    The wet dream for big tech has been to get people to pay subscription fees for compute, just like businesses do for cloud hosting. They tried with Stadia to get people to play games hosted in the cloud, but that was never going to fly.

    With the compute demands of AI (which is comparable to a AAA game except for the largest models), they dont want to make the same mistake and let you have the compute. They see this as an oppurtunity for subscription fees for the earth.

    The fact that we cant get hardware for a reasonable price is an added bonus to this plan.

    All of this only works of everyone subscribes to this shit. Businesses will, because its just easier to manage it. Consumers though should not give in. If you want to run an agent, use a small local model.

    The best thing that can be done is to make local open source agents and models approachable for regular users. Right now, they arent.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      The wet dream for big tech has been to get people to pay subscription fees for compute, just like businesses do for cloud hosting.

      Thankfully there’s a growing number of businesses that have been burned by this, and it seems like companies are starting to try bringing their critical systems back in-house again

      • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 days ago

        There is this tipping point where it becomes more cost effective to bring it inhouse, even with the staffing requirements. For small to medium sized buinesses though cloud all the way.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          where it becomes more cost effective

          Reliability and risk are also factors. What do you do when a vendor tries to lock you into a walled garden before cranking up prices? What about storage of sensitive information? Sometimes the additional cost of doing it in-house pays off in ways that are difficult to track

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      The wet dream for big tech has been to get people to pay subscription fees for compute, just like businesses do for cloud hosting.

      Imagine the mental health benefits when AI datacentres make computers unaffordable, so we all have to go outside more, and then the AI datacentres shrivel because they have no customers, because we can’t access anything with no computers. So the AI companies die off.

      I can dream, ok?

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        I would love this to be an unintended outcome from all this. However, I don’t think that’s where we’re headed.

        I, for one, think there’s a lot of slop in and around the engineering of phones. We might see a lot more software, storage, and overall activity crunched, compressed, and crammed into our portable devices instead. And with more stuff in the cloud/SaaS realm, they can also become (even) thinner clients at the same time. :(

        It’s “heavier” gear like laptops and desktops that’ll probably get pushed into the pro and “prosumer” market.

    • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      I work for a large retailer that you’ve definitely heard of. We are pulling away from our cloud hosted presence and are building out a self-managed virtual data center in one of our own physical data centers.

      Even enterprise knows that paying a monthly uncontrolled cost is shit.

      • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        So you guys are bascially building out your own cloud? Where does one even start with something like that?

        We are fully cloud where I am, but i have this dream where we self host our inferrence. Ever since i learned more about that 40k acre data cneter in Utah offering capacity for the big guys (AWS, etc), im very skeptical about how safe our data is when sending it to a model. Ethical issues aside

  • Asafum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    17 days ago

    If we can’t make a time machine to go backwards, can we at least pause time? The future absolutely fucking sucks, let’s just avoid it altogether lol

    • Fishnoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Seed debris in the orbit to destroy current satellites and then prevent new ones from being launched for several decades

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    17 days ago

    I keep thinking maybe things will good by 2030 and remember that’s 4 years away. Game devs please target the Steam Deck and Switch 2 as the baseline. Mid range and high end is just too premium for most people. Even entry level enthusiast gaming hardware is too expensive because of memory and storage. Steam Deck and Switch 2 are good low power draw integrated graphics level. That’s not terrible for pricing

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    17 days ago

    Motherboards were already way too goddamn expensive, anyway.

    About a year ago I was considering upgrading my AM4 PC to AM5. The rock-bottom cheapest motherboards were only slightly cheaper than the relatively high-end one I got 5-ish years ago. I decided to stick with my current PC.

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 days ago

    I have a home server waiting around for an SSD for a year now. I have the money, but I don’t like feeling like I’m getting scammed. So I’d rather wait for this market to collapse than give them my money.

  • msage@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 days ago

    Can we create a fund with gamers, and then buy the manufacturers that go under?

    We need just one of each, MB, PS, GPU, hopefully something for CPU will be buyable as well.

    • Xenny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      I literally don’t think we will have enough money. These are near trillion dollar factories we’re talking about. Whole countries can’t even afford to make more.

      The sheer amount of global cooperation necessary to make these things is baffling.