• Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is just another dog and pony show. If the company doesn’t have any offices or assets in utah, then they don’t have to care. Utah can censor it’s own internet if it doesn’t like it.
    This law simply has no legs to stand on.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      The point is it will spread. Unless you can convince people to jump to i2p en masse it not going to end well.

      I have to wonder how a webtorrent based setup on Yggdrasil would perform…

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        But why would it spread? Utah can pass this because they don’t have a large presense of tech companies with deep pockets to oppose it. But any state that does is going to be up against those tech companies. And we know money usually wins. The whole biting the hand that feeds you thing and all.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        No chance. Why do you think all the tech billionaires were at the inauguration. Plus, trump is very pro business. So are Republicans in general.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m not 100% sure. But in general, interstate commerce is the federal governments domain.
        And if the company has no assets in the state, what could a state court do if the company didn’t pay? The state court has no jurisdiction outside the state. Now if I was an exec for that company, I wouldn’t take any trips there just to be safe…