Generative AI art was used to create illustrations for its upcoming expansion, and it sounds like the developer is all-in on using it for its future output.
Their previous release used existing public domain art, were they already at the “not interested in quality and want to make $$ by cutting all corners” level when they did that?
Their previous release used existing public domain art, were they already at the “not interested in quality and want to make $$ by cutting all corners” level when they did that?
They were,
But AI is industrial plagiarism. There’s a big difference in the legality of using AI vs using publically licensed materials.
You don’t know how generative AI works. Or what plagarism means. Or possibly both.
BTW, what if these folks are using Adobe Firefly? It was trained entirely on licensed materials.
If you pose the ignorance of a person replying, the custom should be to explain the concepts they do not understand.