• gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    18 days ago

    The excuse that it’s for security reasons just immediately falls apart when you get to this part of the article:

    The notice from the FCC states that companies can apply for conditional approval for new products from the Department of War or the Department of Homeland Security. However, that requires the businesses to provide a plan for shifting at least some of their manufacturing to the US in order to receive that conditional approval.

    So it’s fine to supposedly threaten national security if you do some more manufacturing in the US? Uh-huh. How does that balance out exactly?

    • AngryDeuce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 days ago

      The unwritten part is where Trump gets a free gold plated golf cart or some other stupid shit to sweeten the deal.

      Its grift allllll the way down.

    • MortUS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      In the Age of Technology and AI, it does make sense to have any manufacturing operations in house than overseas. Ofc if there were countries we could trust that would be onpar as well, but the U.S. pretty much shit the bed on alliances.

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Sounds like it’s just a modern version of Indulgences to me.

        You have all sinned against God America, but if you pay the donation to the church government then you will be given access to heaven America