• Don_Dickle@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      When I wrote this I was on layover with about a couple shots of liquid cocaine and many ice teas in me with a bunch of xanax. I just landed. So yea you do that after getting of a 72 hour shift, drink because your afraid of flying and don’t want to cause a incedent you would write the same. Or I can try to southernize it for you.

  • Devolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is what happens when conservatives take control of anything. Please make us suffer. We deserve it.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Your question makes no sense.

    No, you’re not viewed as terrorists. You’re viewed as allies that will get dragged into a war on our side if we get attacked by Russia.

    • FelixCress@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      a war on our side if we get attacked by Russia

      You must have been in a coma for the last year or so. USA under Trump is more likely to attack Greenland than to help Europe fighting Russia.

      • zxqwas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Trump taco. He did not move any troops or metal towards greenland. When he does not move troops he does not intend to attack, he intends to move the opinion.

        My guess why he did that (greenland and threaten to not aid NATO): He wanted to push the European opinion towards “fuck you we will spend more on our own military”.

        The opinion of every US administration the last decades, Obama, Biden, Trump has been that Europe should spend more on defense instead of relying on US. Trump achieves this goal by being obnoxious and hated and ironically the complete lack of diplomatic skill.

        • Uruanna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          The opinion of every US administration the last decades, Obama, Biden, Trump has been that Europe should spend more on defense instead of relying on US.

          The US makes weapons, sell weapons, and controls the countries they sell those weapons to. Trump doesn’t get any of that and broke the control that US had on everyone. He’s the reason countries suddenly started getting worried that the US could turn off the planes they sold them whenever they wanted. The US has bases in every country, and Trump is the reason people are suddenly getting worried about them.

          When they used to say Europe should spend more, it’s by buying American.

        • FelixCress@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Trump taco.

          He attacked Venezuela and Iran, so there is that 🙄

          The opinion of every US administration the last decades, Obama, Biden, Trump has been that Europe should spend more on defense instead of relying on US

          Yes, but only the very last one sided with Russia against democratic countries. And explicitly said they would want to dismantle EU.

          • zxqwas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            He moved metal and troops into position. He did not start moving anything towards greenland.

              • zxqwas@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Your retort to my taco reply was that he did Venezuela and Iran.

                You can figure out when he is doing a taco and when he is actually threatening a war. Greenland rhetoric was not accompanied by troop movement.