• minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Would also be cheaper if the government owned the energy infrastructure and ran at cost.

        • Spaniard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          That’s not an answer. In my city for example, the water and trash service are public and price duplicated from 2024, water pipes, sanitation and all that is public infrastructure maintained by the city, the only thing private in this whole thing may be the trash trucks.

          Energy is also heavily subsidized and we still have to pay a lot.

          In my experience government doesn’t make utilities cheaper.

          • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 minutes ago

            If it was private, you would pay more for the same service, because the private company has all the same costs as now, but also needs to make a profit. So if you keep it public, it will cost less.

            • Spaniard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              17 seconds ago

              Not necessarily, it could also be better run, more efficient with less employees.

              For example maybe instead of 4 sets of at least 2 trash containers around my street there would only be 2 or 1 with all the pertinent colors (the company does more stuff than water)