Google: “Based on this feedback and our ongoing conversations with the community, we are building a new advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn’t verified. We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren’t tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer. It will also include clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved, but ultimately, it puts the choice in their hands.”

Thank god. I would’ve ditched Android for good if this went through, and while it sounds like it would be annoying for casual users to enable unverified apps, at least we can still install them.

  • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Google is paving the ground for Linuxphones.
    It’s so blatantly obvious how evil they’ve become that it makes striving for alternatives a necessity.

  • qwestjest78@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    Not good enough. Google showed their hand and they will try this garbage again at a later date

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren’t tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer. It will also include clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved, but ultimately, it puts the choice in their hands.

    The current system requires user to enable developer options, which is already hidden behind a dark pattern (tapping the Build number multiple times) then enabling the installation of apps of unknown sources for specific apps, which also comes with a warning.

    It’s basically what we have already, so cut the bullshit and leave it be.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      that warning was not at all prominent, and as others have said, t does not exist anymore on modern android

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Err, that’s not true on the last fee devices I’ve used, Pixels and a Fairphone. Installing apps from APK files doesn’t require me to enable dev options. In fact trying to install an APK from say Files brings me straight to the permission setting. It’s also per-app. It can be accessed under Settings > Apps > Special app access > Install unknown apps.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I wonder if they realized phone sales would drop if they made it virtually impossible to maintain privacy apps and OS.

  • sonofearth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 hours ago

    … continues to make Play Integrity an integral part of Android and making all the stupid banking and govt apps requiring having it on your phone thus making it harder to de-google.

    still no… fuck you.

  • androidisking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Literally idk why people are saying “If this happens I’ll switch to an iPhone”

    Like bruh Apple is even a more closed off walled garden? What sort of sense does that make to switch to something twice as expensive and gives you absolutely no control?

    Even if Google decided to implement this in the future, I will never switch to an iPhone and neither should you

    • 鳳凰院 凶真 (Hououin Kyouma)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Lol its like the Americans going “I’ll just move to China”…

      Me as a someone who was born in mainland China and gained US Citizenship:

      (meanwhile my grandmother just obtained US Citizenship too lmao)

  • rollerbang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m still slowly moving towards a Linux phone. That I can install whatever on, of course.

    Maybe even eInk screen. Just that currently there’s nothing with eSIM as well.

        • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          We were in Malaysia and Brunei last year and honestly dual sim on my phone worked way better than eSIM on my mum’s iPhone. No issues whatsoever.

          • rollerbang@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            35 minutes ago

            I never claimed it worked better or worse. I’m saying my experience is good though. And the hassle is much less.

            Can also come to another country prepared. I don’t have to be looking, swapping. It just works.

            • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              32 minutes ago

              I mean I guess. We came prepared and the experience was still bad so I really don’t see the point of wSIM to be completely honest.

              But if it works for you I can see how that might discourage you from picking certain phones.

              • rollerbang@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                30 minutes ago

                I may simply have had a good run. But I do recall negative experience from the last, when I’ve used local SIMs. Ive been constantly harassed in some countries by their operators sending me ads all the time. Couldn’t be stopped.

                No such issues currently with 2 eSIM providers that I use regularly.

    • InfiniteStruggle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Hey, could you expand on why you prefer eSIMs? I’ve seen this idea in many places but couldn’t find any reasons to prefer eSIMs over physical.

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I have been looking at getting a flip phone and ditching this “Smart phone” bullshit altogether, I still might. I’m sick of this rug pull bullshit and no one can convince me they aren’t just going to try again.

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    For the last two years, I’ve been running my own mail server, ready to cut over the moment google wants to fuck around again. I’m happy NOT depending on my own mail server as long as possible, but it’s clear the free lunch is going to end one day. I’ve started backing my way out of Android and I’m surely not going to be buying another iOS or Android phone.

  • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yea no, just don’t change things. Things are good as they are without them trying to encroach further on our ownership of our devices.

    • popcar2@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’m guessing they’re going to hide it in developer tools with a bunch of warnings and no explanation on how to get there so regular users don’t turn it on by accident.

    • pipe01@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Did you read the article?

      The company is building a new ‘advanced flow’ that allows these users to accept the risks of installing unverified apps. Previously, the only permitted method for experienced users to install apps from unverified developers was to use ADB.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Oh no nothing so user-friendly. They’re gonna require them to be loaded via adb every time. And they’ll say that’s the only way they could do it for security or some shit.