I know Intel is dipping its toe into the GPU market, but let’s be real, AMD and nVidia are the only options and have been for the last 20+ years. The manufacturers/assemblers of the complete graphics cards are varied and widespread, but the core tech comes from two companies only.

Why is this the case? Or am I mistaken and am just brainwashed by marketing, and there are in fact other viable options for GPUs?

Cheers!

  • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s not even really “two companies”. Nvidia has 92% of the entire market. And the reason for that is mostly CUDA and its ecosystem which has become widespread among developers.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think 90+% marketshare is technically considered a monopoly in many places.
      But the existence of AMD still makes a huge difference IMO, you do have an alternative option, and Nvidia doesn’t control the market completely.
      Also personally I use AMD because I’m on Linux, and I don’t want the proprietary Nvidia driver to fuck up my system.
      So AFAIK on Linux, the majority actually run AMD.