Governor reveals election rigging response act to counter Trump’s push to gain five extra seats in Texas midterms

Gavin Newsom, California’s governor, said on Thursday state Democratic lawmakers would move forward with a redistricting plan to counter the Republican-led map-drawing effort in Texas aimed at securing a House majority after the midterm elections.

Newsom, joined by congressional Democrats and legislative leaders, unveiled a plan, known as the election rigging response act, that would override California’s independent redistricting commission and draw new congressional lines – a direct counter to a Texas effort, sought by Donald Trump, to push through mid-cycle maps that could hand Republicans five extra US House seats. The governor vowed the move would “neuter and neutralize” Texas’s proposal.

“Today is liberation day in the state of California,” Newsom declared at a rally in Los Angeles, in which he formally called for a 4 November special election to approve a new congressional map. “We can’t stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district all across the country.”

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 months ago

    “We can’t stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district all across the country.”

    Yep, step the fuck up everyone.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is still a form of gerrymandering, right? I hope this does not kick off a wave of disenfranchisement across other red states.

    We really need to get the US territories statehood/representation too. And DC.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I understand. I just fear out of control escalation like bickering characters in a cartoon.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          We already lost the rule of law to a dictator. We didn’t fire the first shot of this civil war, but we can’t ignore it.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I would hardly call it a civil war. It’s a civil struggle for sure, but I don’t think the majority of Americans have their heart in it, and nor should they. They’re being ruled by a minority.

            • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              There are masked men with guns in unmarked cars disappearing people without any law binding them. What would you call that?

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Just a note that none of this impacts presidential elections.

        But if Texas does their thing, this would be a necessary response for the house

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Kicking off, say, five other states redrawing maps to cancel out California and to head off other blue states trying the same.

        That sort of frantic escalation wouldn’t be good.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          from what I’ve gathered (although it’s been hard for me to find the exact info I’m looking for) most of the states with nonpartisan or bipartisan redistricting commissions seem to be democratic states by a significant margin.

          safe to assume the ones that have partisan commissions are already gerrymandered to hell and back. and there’s little to gain from doing it more; there will be diminishing returns.

          i think an all out war would mostly benefit the dems but again i don’t have very concrete data so I’ll qualify these statements to be based on gut and not much more.

          • lemonaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s my gut feeling as well. Gerrymandering is a Republican tradition and they’ve been doing it in red states for decades now. Hard to believe there’s much more to squeeze from it. Blue states however…

  • 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    Newsom, joined by congressional Democrats and legislative leaders, unveiled a plan, known as the election rigging response act, that would override California’s independent redistricting commission and draw new congressional lines

    I don’t fault what they’re doing here; war is war. But just look at how easily the democratic process can be stripped away. Just a flick of the pen and it’s gone. No real safeguards. Not a single shot fired.

  • PlaidBaron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Obviously what Texas is doing is reprehensible but in a winner take all election system where Texas always goes republican and California always goes dem, does this actually makw a difference?

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Shouldn’t they have saved the shot for another state, since Texas (AFAIK) stopped the attempt?

    I mean, I am all for fighting. But Democrats have very little ammo.

    Honestly it seems more like a attention grab for Newsom so he can run for president. I don’t want Newsom as the next candidate…