I do think they will essentially die. They will morph into completely different websites, but I think they will be around for a long time, and I think their userbase won’t shrink even a bit.

Big websites are slowly adopting the facebook model: All the content is hidden and requires you login to view it. Creating an account requires some sort of personally identifying information like a phone number, photo of ID, mailing address, etc.

The old model simply turned out to be unprofitable. It was always done under the motto of “bring the people and the money will come” and so they made it as easy as possible to build up a large user base, but it turns out that motto is false on the internet, and investors have finally realized it. There is no point in having a massive user base if they don’t actually generate a profit for you. Anonymous internet users do not do this. They are indistinguishable from bots. If they don’t use adblock, they don’t click on ads. They don’t donate money. Yet they use up the majority of the server resources.

It used to be that you at least needed anonymous users to generate content for you, but (in part thanks to facebok) non-anonymous usage of the internet has become normalized. If anything the best content will come from someone who has their real name, and profile picture attached to the content they submit. The anonymous nobody is much less likely to post anything valuable.

I think the internet as we know it is dead, and tbh I don’t even blame big corporations for this. I blame mass tech illiteracy, and people’s willingness to sacrifice their privacy for some dopamine hits.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yup, even Digg is still around. Like you, I think reddit will be around for many more years. The content quality, which is already bad, will continue to get worse.

    I didn’t migrate to Lemmy to help kill reddit. I’m here to help Lemmy grow. It’s already a better experience in some ways. Rough around the edges, and needs some features and fixes, but I feel like the user base is already much better than reddit is.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yup, even Digg is still around. Like you, I think reddit will be around for many more years. The content quality, which is already bad, will continue to get worse.

      Digg?

      Hell Fark is still there. And for that matter, Craigslist discussion forums are too.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Usenet is still around.

        It’s not a site but an actual system and predates (by quite a lot) the Web.

        It’s was the social media equivalent back in the old days of the early 90s Internet (before AOL linked to it, before the WWW, even before Gopher).

        After that came IRC (which funnilly enough is also still around, along with modern clones of it such as Discord) as well as online forums (which themselves are the descendants of the old BBSs, minus the whole modem comms part).

        So far in my experience, the only tech that “dies” (well, there often is a handful of people who still do it for fun) is that which is tied to specific hardware (i.e. you don’t really have BBSs anymore because people don’t use modems to connect to a central systems via the phone line anymore) as pure software can live forever on top of emulators or just be reimplemented whilst preserving core features.

        • robocall@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          I still use Craigslist to find jobs and apartments. I sold a car on Craigslist. I still find it useful.

        • railsdev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’ve actually bought a handful of surprisingly nice stuff there. It’s my go-to when I don’t want to pay online prices. Also great for picking up a quality cable modem as people who care about that tend to sell them before moving (just make sure you know the exact model you want beforehand; AKA don’t just buy some random garbage).

          • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            Thanks. Yeah that’s a big motivator for us as well you can only buy so much cheap Chinese Amazon shit.

            That, and we like the idea of having a store to return items if need be, but it’s not as easy as Amazon, there’s no streaming services and they carry less products.

            Jury’s still out, might just keep both cards.

  • Vuipes@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Reddit hasn’t made many significant changes yet, but Twitter is working hard to fail.

  • janonymous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I think the internet as we know it is dead, and tbh I don’t even blame big corporations for this. I blame mass tech illiteracy, and people’s willingness to sacrifice their privacy for some dopamine hits.

    So, you’re blaming the victims? Not the billion dollar corporations, leveraging their immense power and wealth to drain as much value out everything they touch just to discard what remains the second it’s not creating enough money for them? Instead you blame the tech illiterate, that never had a chance? The poor and exploited, caught in the hamster wheel of capitalism barely able to plan until the next pay check?

  • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I don’t think most people actually think that these sites will literally die (well, actually Twitter/X literally dying at some point wouldn’t surprise me all that much), it’s more just hyperbole for jumping the shark.

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      myspace.com is still a website you can visit, but no one does. facebook is going down that path once their userbase ages out of living. the artist formerly known as twitter is going to go bankrupt and a very salty elon musk will sell it for a fraction of what we bought it for and who tf knows what happens to it after that.

  • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I agree with some of your conclusions, but not others, and also not the overall concept. Yes, Reddit is not going to die or disappear. Twitter, I’m not sure how it will be thriving in the future, but it will likely still exist.

    Essentially your main point is that the style of Facebook, mainly, a walled garden with profiling and targeted advertising, has beat more open commercial models. In terms of profitability, that is true. Companies based on that model, Google and Facebook, have been making a lot more money for years than companies less focused on user identity and advertising, like Reddit and Twitter. As far as whether there is profit in anonymity, I definitely don’t agree that non-profiled users are “indistinguishable from bots”, but yes, companies can make a lot more by abusing user privacy. Some people are growing tired of this, but not enough or for long enough. I also don’t agree that anonymous people are ‘nobodies’ who don’t post anything useful. Some of the most popular members of reddit either have no public identity, or it’s superfluous. Did I ever need to see a photo of gallowboob? No. Do I know who PoppinKREME is? No, and I don’t need to, other than their content. Anonymous content does make money for social media sites because even if those people had their ‘real names’ and profile pics, it would make no difference at all. Consumers? Sure, but only because ad profiling and selling data of real identities is more profitable. This is not even close to new as Facebook has been doing that to the tune of billions for over a decade.

    Facebook as a product is not really thriving, and the only way Zuckerberg has found to grow his company is to buy and imitate other companies - bought IG, Whatsapp, copied Snapchat, now copied Twitter. I’d call that the Microsoft Model. Microsoft still exists and does quite well, but not to the same extent they did 20 years ago. Time will run out for Zucka when someone makes a new hit product that he can’t purchase or copy. We don’t know yet what that will be. Another interesting issue is Reddit, Twitter and Facebook have tried to move to charging money monthly vs only advertising.

    The internet as we know it is not dead because my internet was not Twitter. I mean, you’re posting this on Lemmy. The internet does not have to be about making investors and CEOs billions of dollars.

  • 30mag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think they will be around for a long time, and I think their userbase won’t shrink even a bit.

    I think their userbase has already shrank, at least a bit.

  • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    All we can do is our best to create a positive user friendly place for them to migrate when they lose their favorite emoji or are unwilling to mine Bitcoin on their machine or don’t like the idea of having themselves cloned to moderate r/popping or whatever their breaking point is.

  • bbmb@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I think the fact that more information is becoming readily available on federated platforms due to more people moving over to Mastodon and Lemmy for example is definitely making the platform grow as well. With Twitt- sorry, “X” locking down threads to an account, the information on there, as well as other sites eventually, I guarantee, will become less accessible over time. The fediverse hardly has that issue of it’s information becoming less available, and if anything, the structure of hosted instances makes that near impossible for the time being to be phased out. If Threads, for example, went through with adding fediverse support, it probably would not be as widespread as others like Mastodon as such, because the sites that power ActivityPub were designed with users in mind instead of profit.

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      the problem is we don’t have the critical mass of users to make it not a ghost town, and that problem’s starting to get solved. the only moat the twitbooks of the world ever had was their large userbases and once enough people migrate the rest can do so easily

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    If anything the best content will come from someone who has their real name, and profile picture attached to the content they submit.

    Which is why I, actual Hollywood superstar Margot Robbie, make the best “”“content”“” on Lemmy.

    (It’s all shitposting.)