• 5too@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sounds like it can help oncoming traffic as well as traffic to either side of the vehicle

    • chrisbtoo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, the only thing I could think of is that I’m driving down a country road, and I see the front brake light ahead of me because someone stopped for a deer in the road or something.

      Otherwise I cannot fathom what benefit it brings. Anything that ultimately becomes “if you see this light, it’s safe to [X] in front of this vehicle” is going to get people killed.

      And the negative state of “the lack of this light means that the vehicle could be moving” is exactly what we have now.

      • 5too@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Reading through the article, it seems like one scenario is that a vehicle stopped at an intersection might be about to pull out, endangering another vehicle about to cross? It seems like the thinking is, if you notice a front/side brake light stops being lit as you approach the intersection, it might indicate they’re about to accelerate - be cautious!

        I’m not fully convinced either, it seems like a lot of the benefit they’re projecting is based on analysis of historical collisions, rather than any kind of experimental results. It sounds like the study is to justify expanding research to that sort of simulated experimentation, though - I’m curious what that kind of testing would find.