• Fox@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 months ago

    At my old workplace, there was numerous XP machines still going. They were running old machine equipment, and basically served as a controller for the entire machine.

    As it turns out, it was cheaper to keep these XP stations, instead of buying a completely new Hydrolic press, or whatever it was running, which cost several hundred of thousands of dollars.

    One day one of these computers stopped working, and we immediately tried to get the software to work on a brand new W10 replacement. Took us a week of drivers hell, until we eventually went to the basement, found an exact replica, and swapped the HDD over.

    The company, making these heavy machineries, went bankrupt in the early 2000s, and there was literally no way of getting the software to run on anything besides that original box.

    • undrwater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d like a law that software / hardware companies who file for bankruptcies must release the source / files for their tech to an open source repository.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        That idea often comes up in these discussions and I’ve never really had an argument against. Best I got is that parts of that software may have moved to more modern stuff that was purchased by another company. But that’s a damned thin excuse not to implement this.

      • guy_threepwood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you are a big company there are often ESCROW agreements for things like this. I have encountered the “data dumps” from time to time and whilst it’s “better” it’s not ideal. Half finished documentarian, virtual machines of mis-configured OS installs… it’s almost as if it was just a straight copy of the development environment as it was just as they made the final version of the software…

        But it’s better than nothing.

        Main issue I can see with this forcing open source would be libraries and frameworks licensed from others who would likely still be in business and wouldn’t agree to those parts becoming open sourced. See also WinAMP https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/16/opensourcing_of_winamp_goes_badly/

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, and as long as these things never touch the internet, there really isn’t an issue.