• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’d pay for YouTube premium if t wasn’t more expensive than HBO. It’s ridiculous. Especially considering YouTube has no production costs. It’s all user-generated content.

    • focusedkiwibear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      lol zero production costs because they’re not a production studio, genius, lmao. they do have a shit ton of overhead costs though - look into it instead of acting like it costs nothing to be the largest video hosted site on the planet.

      • ilikekeyboards@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Keep 720p only for users who upload crap and aren’t generating revenue and keep 4k for the channels who are uploading quality content. I’ve seen a podcast uploading hours of content in 4k. That is incredibly costly to stream to people.

        I’m not going to pay for a service that is so wasteful with their income and then they want more.

    • synceDD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah they just need bandwidth for a billion people no biggie, thank you for your expertise

    • AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Isn’t their issue more hosting costs and not production costs? Unless they start telling people they can’t upload videos (exception being copyright of course) Youtube greatly outpaces the storage costs of other social media sites.

      They probably still store more than other video-hosting sites too.

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        their problem is probably paying $2 billion a year or some crazy number for nfl football.

    • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      A part of your YT Premium payment goes directly to creators that you watch based on your watch time. That is their content expenses just like HBO for making new shows.

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m confused, if ublock origin and sponsor block and all those are bypassing this, then who is it actually targeting?

      • kopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        have you ever searched “ad blocker” on your browser of choice’s extension store and scrolled down? or had a cheap/free VPN that advertised ad blocking functionality?

        those. for some reason people install those. and they never get updates.

        (some of them are actual malware too)

      • stealin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        They want to frame it so that internet ID is the solution. That way you as a person can be banned, not just the account or ip. Good luck buying and selling when everything becomes digital and you get banned.

        • Kushan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          I understand that, but look at who I am responding to - they seem to think that they’re immune from it.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 years ago

    Dear Youtube: Bring back the downvote count, allow me to disable shorts, allow me to disable your bullshit annoying ass startup music, then half the price and then we’ll talk about paying for your “service”.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Being able did disable content you don’t want aside from ads with a paid membership would be a huge boon.

      Killing shorts would be fantastic, and they shouldn’t care if I’m not using a feature as long as I’m paying.

  • anywho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    2 years ago

    I am paying for YouTube Premium, and yet I still have to skip over US-exclusive sponsor sections which almost every Youtuber has nowadays…

    • ironic_elk@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s why I still use Vanced. Sponsorblock is something I can’t live without even though I have YouTube premium.

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, almost exclusively either Us-centric and not even available where I live, or so gosh darn expensive that I just will never use the stuff advertised (looking at you, magic spoon)

        • joshuaacasey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          you should check out linustechtips. The sponsors they get/accept are actually decent reputable companies with decent products.

          • Pregnenolone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 years ago

            Linus’s video on their sponsors gave them way too much benefit of the doubt for scummy practices I would have dropped a company for

          • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Linus is getting sponsorship from either actually useful tech software that is for enterprise or it’s some weird niche software or product that no one ever needs.

      • mishimaenjoyer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        2 years ago

        if google made youtube premium like $3/month no one would bat an eye and sub. but they’re approaching netflix prices and that’s just way to much. i rather support the creators directly than throwing money at google who will give the creators crumbs until they demonetize them because google is doing google things. also won’t solve the privacy problem that comes with using their native site/apps.

        • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think part of the problem is that they’re hosting so much more content than Netflix. It really is crazy that it’s free to upload to YouTube to just store all your videos on there. Probably 99.9% of YouTube content does not get enough views to justify the cost of storing it.

          All that being said, YouTube premium comes with a bunch of shit nobody wants so surely they could cut that stuff to lower the price (or tiered pricing for people who want it).

      • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        2 years ago

        Google has been shamelessly destroying all their projects the last few years in a desperate fit to make money. They’ve weakened ad blockers on chrome, they’ve altered the search algorithm so random BS is mixed in with regular to drive towards sponsored content, their starting to setup browser level DRM and creating un skipable ads. None of this is for anything more than greed and desperation. They no longer see anything other than money as the end goal and don’t care if their selling a shittier product at a higher price than no one was ever even willing to pay for. F*ck google.

        • regbin_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          YT Premium costs less than $4 for me and I also get YT Music. It sure beats paying $4 for only a music service.

            • regbin_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’ll stop paying when it stops working. Also regional pricing. I pay around $3.9 for Premium + Music.

        • Tenniswaffles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          And that’s how things die due to no revenue. Running YouTube is expensive af and the more people who used things like revanced, the worse things will become for everyone else.

          • Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Maybe they shouldn’t operate in the first place if they cannot think of a sustainable business model without f*ing their users up.

            • Tenniswaffles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Basically everything within capitalism fucks over someone that’s just business as usual 8n out society. Usually to a much worse degree, think the children who likely made your clothes for next to nothing. I’m all for tearing down the system, but there’s not a whole lot as an individual that I can do.

            • Tenniswaffles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              You’ll care as more and more people have to quit YouTube or make progressively more shit content to appease the algorithm. It also makes it harder and harder for new people to start on YouTube.

        • regbin_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          Because somehow paying $4 a month is unreasonable for a service that I use for 2-4 hours every day.

          Right.

          • histy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 years ago

            why do I need to keep explaining this? This is not about 4 bucks, this is about a multinational company that has a monopoly and last year made a profit of 59 billion dollars, and not happy with that profit is trying to extort even more money from users from whom it already sells the data it collects.

            A company that does not care about the security and privacy of its own users and treats content creators and employees like garbage.

            And to make matters worse due to google’s own greed, if it had an acceptable amount and length for advertisements (and cared about the legitimacy and type of content distributed by these advertisers) no one would be forced to use ad blockers. And that’s just the part that concerns youtube, as the problems with google’s other products and actions go even deeper.

            But of course, that’s about 4 bucks.

  • Jennie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    fuck YouTube premium. why would I pay £19.99 a month when literally the only defining feature for me is no ads. all this will do is allow for more complex ad blockers to be made to bypass this

    • Z4rK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      The creators also get a good chunk of the money from premium as far as I’ve been able to verify (by asking some I follow directly).

      • Hardeehar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Why not pay creators directly through Patreon PayPal or equivalent instead of Google as well?

        • mjs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 years ago

          If no one pays for YouTube how can they keep supporting their insanely costly infrastructure? Hosting all those videos is not free. Far from it.

          I’m perfectly fine paying for YouTube if that means I can continue to have access to awesome creators under a easy to use platform. It would be a very sad day if Google decided to shut down YouTube due to not being able to cover it’s costs.

          The only other company that could potentially take over would be meta. Which would probably be even worse. At least YouTube provides an option to pay to disable ads.

          • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            I just wish they kept the ads at the start and end. There is something off putting about watching some documentary about some horrible event only to have it pause for some perky Grammarly ad in the middle of it.

          • Hardeehar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            I would be fine if YouTube crumbled and was put into second place by a better platform or two.

            Yes it’s the best option currently which is why they can do such ridiculous practices.

            But once they have actual competition, I expect them to bend over backwards for my attention. Because if they don’t change the current trajectory, they’ll go the way of the other digital giants of the past.

            Do not worry about having a viable platform in a future without YouTube. I am 100% sure there will be one.

          • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            This is an extremely unlikely hypothetical. Google is one of the most profitable companies in the world and there is no sign of that changing, even considering all the people who block ads right now. There is no reason to squeeze everyone like this.

    • sunbytes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      There’s a lite version that’s only for the ads.

      It’s cheaper than the full 19.99.

      While that might still be too much, I just wanted to point out that if you don’t want ads, it doesn’t cost the full 20quid.

      • Oaulo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        This was news to me so I went looking and couldn’t find it on youtube. Reading articles seems to indicate it is only available in certain regions and at certain times. I finally found the link to the page (https://www.youtube.com/premiumlite) and confirmed it’s not available for me in the US at least.

  • dmrzl@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 years ago

    “While the duration of this timer isn’t revealed, we expect it to be somewhere around 30 to 60 seconds.”

    Peak journalism.

  • I_Miss_Daniel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 years ago

    Up next: An AI-enabled Web Browser extension which

    • mutes the YouTube ads and overlays it with cute cat videos
    • clicks the “skip” button for you
  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 years ago

    I just got my first 30 second UNSKIPPABLE ad on my TV the other day…I closed youtube, as watching a 1min video is NOT worth 30 seconds of ads

  • shashi154263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 years ago

    The worst part of YouTube ads is super long ads (sometimes even multiple hours long). It has happened to me multiple times. And coincidentally it always happens when I’m feeling sleepy.

    Here is a screenshot.

  • hackitfast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    NewPipe, and YouTube Revanced are great apps you can use on mobile. They aren’t attached to any Google account so you can just use them and skip adds all day without getting any account theoretically banned.

    For those who continue to use YouTube and adblockers on PC, simply just make a new throwaway Google account. In the case that they aren’t actually bluffing (they are) then at least your temp account will be banned.

    • hypertown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Revanced is great because it lets you watch without ads WITH Google account. I know that if you’re focused on privacy the last thing you want is Google account but for me the benefit of YouTube algorithm suggesting me exactly what I want to watch is enough the reason to not use any platform/app that doesn’t support login. Of course they need to try more before I’ll pay for premium. For now if that dialog ever shows up to me I’m setting my UA to Android and see if that happens on mobile YouTube as well. Since they don’t care too much about that version of YouTube it’s possible that dialog will not show up. If that’s blocked too I’m installing waydroid and revanced on it. Also I hope that development of VueTube will speed up because currently it’s so slow I’m not sure if it will ever be finished and it would be great to have alternatives to revanced.

    • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Or just don’t use an account. I’ve been doing that since Google force merged YouTube and Google accounts in like 2011.