• Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ima be honest. I don’t run ad blockers. The way I see it, if I’m consuming content from a given source and that source invested time and/or money into said content then they deserve to be compensated for it. I am not willing to pay a subscription for every website out there, so ads are an acceptable compromise.

    • Rose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I run ad blockers. As a security measure. Ad companies collect insane amount of data and do a bunch of shady stuff whenever they can get away with it.

      I want to support websites whenever I’m able, but the way ad companies operate just ain’t it.

      If they clean up their act, maybe then I could stop using ad blockers, but it’s been decades and I don’t have high hopes.

      Also using ad blockers for performance and usability reasons. For example, I used to use a bunch of Fandom wikis and couldn’t understand why people hated the UI. Then I saw how Fandom looks like without ad blockers and holy shit how can humans live like this

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I do, but it’s less about the ads and more about privacy. I don’t use things like sponsor block because there’s pretty much no privacy violation there. But I do use an ad blocker because advertisers track me across websites to build up a profile.

      I also don’t want to make a free account, again because of privacy concerns (both from the site and from any data breaches.

      I’m happy to pay a little for content, but I haven’t yet seen a system that respects my privacy and is reasonably priced. If that was a thing, I’d totally pay.

      • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I just use Safari and private relay for that. But yeah I can understand that particular point. I mean I’m not against ad blockers, it’s just that I don’t use them for the reasons I stated.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s totally fair.

          I’d really like some extension where I can compensate websites in exchange for not having ads. Let me load up a balance and present the option to deduct $0.0X to see read/watch past the teaser. The website wouldn’t need to track me to get paid, and the browser/extension could merely track balances and keep an anonymous accounting of transactions to send a single larger payment later (to save on fees).

          I’d totally use that.

    • toxygen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You remind me of the old guy at work who called me a “FUCKING FREELOADER” because I told him about uBlock origin.

      I’m never recommending it again to anyone and I have since kept it a secret that I use an ad-blocker. I guess it’s a problem for people.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Don’t let this one person stop you.

        I’m still recommended it to everybody.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      At this point ad blocking is more about security and optimization than stopping ads themselves. If a site wants to run some banner ads to pay for costs, I have nothing against it, but once Javascript is involved, that just becomes a vulnerability for attack.

      Also, websites that bury their content in layers of overlay and popup ads with loud audio and several unrelated videos can go fuck themselves.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      There have been very decent alternatives, but they never took off.

      One such was Flattr. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flattr

      Flattr was a Swedish-based microdonation subscription service, where subscribers opted in to pay a monthly patronage to help fund their favourite websites and creators. It shut down in November 2023.[1]

      Flattr subscribers installed an open-source browser extension that records which websites they frequent and shares this data with Flattr.[2] Flattr processes this user data and pays out shares of the user’s subscription to each registered Flattr creator based on which websites the user consumed.[3] Flattr filtered websites by domains with a default allowlist of participating domains, but individual users could override and contribute to any website they want or withhold contributions from any website.[4]

      I used it for a while, but not many websites and creators used it, so most of my money was going towards a select few.