• Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Sports are games.

    Games are supposed to be inclusive and fun.

    Society taking games deathly serious (and equivocating it with academic merit, aka serious pursuits) is the problem.

    People rioting and murdering if the game didn’t work out for their team is the problem. Putting billion dollar stakes on games is the problem.

    Trans people or any people wanting to play games with their friends should be what society fosters and nurtures as the entire fucking point of society’s existence. Something something… planting trees something something knowing they’ll never sit under…

    Nope? let’s bring on the climate change induced extinction then. If our values are hyper competitive, dog eat dog bullshit from labor to fucking games, we should go extinct.

    • Makhno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Trans people or any people wanting to play games with their friends should be what society fosters and nurtures as the entire fucking point of society’s existence. Something something… planting trees something something knowing they’ll never sit under…

      Coed teams exist. They’re finding issue with mtf athletes playing against a league of individuals who didn’t go through puberty as a male. That’s clearly an advantage, and to say otherwise is to ignore science altogether.

      Maybe the solution is non-gendered weight classes for sports, or just more coed teams. Idk

      Edit: yall will convince yourselves of anything lol. Really wild the dumb shit some people will say

      • Emily (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        What about trans women who transitioned before puberty? What about cis or intersex women with elevated levels of testosterone? What about sports where it has been shown that after a long enough period of medical transition trans people have no significant advantage over their cis counterparts?

        You appeal to science yet fail to cite a single source, so let me do it for you:

        An individual’s sex does not determine their success or failure at any athletic event despite the high level of competition. This can be demonstrated when looking at not average outcomes, but the level of overlap among outcomes… While sex differences do develop following puberty, many of the sex differences are reduced, if not erased, over time by gender affirming hormone therapy.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        They’re finding issue with mtf athletes playing against a league of individuals who didn’t go through puberty as a male.

        Good news! Puberty blockers exist and have been studied and used for literal decades for other reasons.

        That’s clearly an advantage, and to say otherwise is to ignore science altogether.

        The science says 2-3 years of hormone therapy levels the playing field and there’s no more advantage.

        In fact, women who haven’t transitioned often have an advantage because their testosterone levels can be higher than women who have transitioned.

        And that’s the crux of the issue: human variation.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The science says 2-3 years of hormone therapy levels the playing field and there’s no more advantage.

          Would you be opposed to a requirement that trans women wanting to compete in women’s leagues undergo 3 years of hormone therapy before being allowed to play?

          • straightjorkin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think most trans people would agree that’s reasonable, but at that point, you also have to talk about the bans on transition for minors, which would affect a minors ability to have that time frame met, and then their ability to play.

      • Uruanna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        They’re finding issue with mtf athletes playing against a league of individuals who didn’t go through puberty as a male. That’s clearly an advantage, and to say otherwise is to ignore science altogether.

        That would be an argument worth discussing if the Nazis weren’t also trying to ban puberty blockers and frothing at the mouth claiming the trans agenda is coming for their kids. But no, right now, that’s a garbage bad faith argument, because it already has an obvious answer. That’s how they poison the discussion.

      • BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        Please tell me what these “issues” are, with peer reviewed scientific sources. There are no significant advantages to a “male puberty” that are not countered by HRT. Furthermore, the same people touting trans kids for their supposed “advantages” are the same people forcing them to develop those “advantages” by restricting their access to healthcare before puberty begins.

        The cruelty is the point.

    • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Games are supposed to be fair. Unless you’re going to completely desegregate men and women’s sports, there’s a real biological argument to be made here. To pretend otherwise is delusional.