• Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is there not a security concern of doing basic checks before handing out cash?

      For instance, elderly woman gets a text message telling her the IRS needs $50k cash or they’ll take her house. The bank says they need a few days, she complains that the IRS wants it now…and then they help explain that it’s likely a scam.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, typically. I don’t know if that trumps “the bank has to give you your money when you ask for your money.”

  • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hmm, are you still covered by the FDIC if you deliberately engineer a bank failure? Let’s say all of Bank of America’s customers decided that they just really wanted to fuck BoA hard. So they arrange to all demand the complete liquidations of their accounts, all at once. Or maybe people arrange a series of bank failures as part of some broader political movement. But hypothetically, if a group of people deliberately caused their bank to fail, would their deposits still be FDIC-insured? In other words, if you deliberately arrange a bank run, will you still be covered by FDIC insurance?

    • bestagon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      It exists to cover bank runs and it is your money. There is nothing wrong with wanting your money in any given moment. That’s just my take though, I’m not a lawyer.

      I think it’d basically defeat its preventative purpose though if a story got out that people weren’t covered, even in an engineered bank run. What if you’re not in on the plot? What if it happens tomorrow at your bank? Are you just fucked too? Better withdraw all your money to be safe

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        What a potentially powerful tool of protest. Imagine if you got a movement of a few million people. They all move to a target bank. A few months later, they all demand their full account liquidation. Then you move on to the next megabank. One by one, drop them like flies.

    • DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’d be hard to prove a single participant. An organizer, maybe? But if you just heard everybody’s doing a bank run on the 20th and you’re scared of the stability of your bank, so you decide to withdraw your money on the 19th so you can put it into another bank, that seems reasonable.

      (i know nothing about digital transfers between banks)

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I struggle to understand what modern insurance companies actually exist for, apart from money people donating money to them for nothing in return.