• BertramDitore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is really messed up, and I sympathize with her situation, but this is not torture. Words matter. I’d call this harassment, fraud, or malicious company behavior, but not torture. Doesn’t mean it’s right, and the company/seller should absolutely be held responsible.

    • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s hyperbole. You’ve never been very hungry and said “I’m starving” or been out in very hot weather for a while and said “I’m dying out here”? I’m pretty sure the average reader is able to figure out from context she has not actually been abducted to a black site and waterboarded.

  • Echo71Niner@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 years ago

    Amazon isn’t the one responsible for this action; rather, it’s the sellers who are altering the return address of their products to evade return fees. Opting for a random address is a more cost-effective choice for them. Amazon can stop it.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 years ago

    Deny the ones with customs charges. Keep, donate or sell the rest of it. For $300 I’d be happy to donate decent stuff to local shelters though.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    why is Collect-On-Delivery even allowed? It should be a gamble for the shipper. The person being delivered to can pay if they want. If not then they should not send Collect-On-Delivery stuff to them.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Well even if it is collect-on-delivery, the woman is clearly not actually taking a delivery. So there ought to be nothing to collect and the parcel goes back to the sender. The whole article ultimately comes down to some shady dealers (not Amazon) sending a woman stuff, and USPS (not Amazon) being assholes and trying to strongarm her into paying because they don’t want to take the parcels back despite her legally not accepting them.

      As far as Amazon goes they are assholes, but mainly for not verifying that the return address sellers use is actually valid, but I also wonder to what degree they can know. I guess they could require a business contact at that address to verify that yes, this is indeed the return address for parcels by company XYZ?

  • Stinkywinks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    What’s so hard about opening the door and kicking the box into the street? Picking it up and tossing it in the trash? Maybe donate them to the homeless or the needy? Crying about free stuff, their life must be tough.

  • downpunxx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I mean it wouldn’t take much to start her own store on ebay, or amazon, or wherever and just start reselling them, even for a couple bucks profit a piece after shipping and fees, this should be like manna from heaven, free stuff, i mean, what lol, just sell the stuff on